DIPAK MISRA, A. M. KHANWILKAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD
Vijay Kumar Rastogi – Appellant
Versus
Uttar Pradesh State Roadways Transport Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A.M. Khanwilkar, J.
The present appeals take exception to the judgment of the High Court of Delhi in MAC Appeal No.393/2009 dated 6th December, 2016, whereby the High Court declined to enhance the compensation amount awarded to the appellant by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and to the order dated 18th January, 2017 dismissing the Review Petition No.20 of 2017. 2. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short, "the Tribunal") vide order dated 4th April, 2009, awarded compensation to the appellant and his father-in-law to the tune of Rs. 5,59,584/- and Rs. 4,53,131/-, respectively, against which four appeals were filed before the High Court, one each by the appellant and his father-in-law and two cross appeals by the respondent, all of which were disposed of by the impugned judgment. The appellant alone has assailed the impugned judgment and prays for grant of enhanced compensation amount. 3. As can be gleaned from the claim petition, the appellant and his father-in-law suffe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.