Harsh Mandar vs Amit Anilchandra Shah

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2016 Supreme(SC) 1147

S.A.BOBDE, ASHOK BHUSHAN
Harsh Mandar – Appellant
Versus
Amit Anilchandra Shah – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Mr. Anand Grover, Dr. Rajiv Dhawan, Mr. Rajesh Inamdar, Mr. Javedur Rahman, Mr. Nizam Pasha, Mr. Farrukh Rasheed
For the Respondents: Mr. H.N. Salve, Mr. S.V. Raju, Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Mr. Karan Lahari, Mr. E.C. Agrawala

ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. We see no reason to entertain this petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

3. Application for permission to file lengthy list of dates stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2016 Supreme(SC) 1147

S.A.BOBDE, ASHOK BHUSHANHarsh Mandar – AppellantVersusAmit Anilchandra Shah – Respondent

S.A.BOBDE, ASHOK BHUSHAN
Harsh Mandar – Appellant
Versus
Amit Anilchandra Shah – Respondent