SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 1155

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.K. Sikri, Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ.
State through Lokayukta Police, Raichur - Appellant
Versus
C.N. Manjunath - Respondent
Criminal Appeal Nos. 1140 of 2016; 89 & 113-114 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) Nos. 3584 of 2012; 8162 of 2015 & 6191-6192 of 2012)
Decided On : 22-11-2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Nagmohan Das, Ms. Anitha Shenoy, T.V. Ratnam, Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar, Ms. Pradnya S. Adgaonkar, Joseph Aristotle S., Ms. Priya Aristotle, Ms. K. Priyadarshini, J. Aristotle S., V.N. Raghupathy, Lagnesh Mishra, Parikshit P. Angadi

Licensed surveyors appointed under Section 18A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act are to be treated as 'public servants' for the purposes of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, based on their performance of statutory duties and public functions.

Headnote:

licensed surveyor - public servant - Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, Section 18A, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - The court held that licensed surveyors appointed under Section 18A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act are to be treated as 'public servants' for the purposes of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court analyzed the provisions of Section 18A, 128, and 131 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, along with the relevant rules, to establish that licensed surveyors perform statutory duties and public functions, thereby falling within the definition of 'public servant' under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Fact of the Case:

The issue involved in the appeals was whether licensed surveyors under Section 18A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act should be treated as 'public servants' for the purposes of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The High Court had conflicting views on this issue, leading to the matter being referred to a larger Bench.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that licensed surveyors appointed under Section 18A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act are to be treated as 'public servants' for the purposes of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court relied on the provisions of the Act and relevant rules to establish that licensed surveyors perform statutory duties and public functions, thereby falling within the definition of 'public servant' under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Issues: The main issue was whether licensed surveyors under Section 18A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act should be considered 'public servants' under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the analysis of the provisions of Section 18A, 128, and 131 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, along with the relevant rules, which established that licensed surveyors perform statutory duties and public functions, thereby falling within the definition of 'public servant' under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Final Decision: Criminal Appeal No.89 of 2017 and Criminal Appeal Nos. 113-114 of 2017 were dismissed, and Criminal Appeal No. 1140 of 2016 was allowed, affirming that licensed surveyors appointed under Section 18A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act are to be treated as 'public servants' for the purposes of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Sikri, J.

Leave granted.

2. The issue involved in these appeals is as to whether the respondent who was appointed as licenced surveyor under Section 18A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') would be treated as "public servant" for the purposes of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. There was a difference of opinion expressed by the different Benches of the High Court and, therefore, the matter was referred to the larger Bench. The Division Bench vide its judgment dated 29th November, 2011 in Criminal Petition No. 10853 of 2011 resolved the issue by holding that such a licenced surveyor would be treated as a 'public servant' as defined under Section 2(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The material portion of the said judgment reads as under: -

"For considering the aforementioned issue referred to us, it is necessary to refer to certain of the provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act and Karnataka Land Revenue Rules framed thereunder as also the Prevention of Corruption Act. Section 18-A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 reads thus:

"18-A. Appointment of Licensed Surveyors: -

(1) The Director of Survey Settlement and Land Records may, for the purposes of the third proviso to Section 128 and of clause (c) of Section 131, issued with the prior approval of the State Government and subject to such conditions and restrictions and in such manner as may be prescribed, a licence to any person (hereinafter referred to as the "Licensed Surveyor") possessing the prescribed qualifications and experience.

(2) The fee payable to a Licensed Surveyor shall be as may be prescribed"

2(a). Section 18-A is inserted by Amendment Act No. 14 of 1999 with effect from 30th April, 1999. The object of the said amendment is as under:

Amending Act 14 of 1999 - Some more than three lakhs of mutation phody cases are pending for measurement and many cases are pending disposal due to change of survey numbers, variation of extent and other reasons. It is considered necessary to entrust the work of preparing sketch of the properties of private surveyors (who will be called as Licensed Surveyors) who shall possess such qualifications and experience, as may be prescribed by inserting a new section to Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

It is also proposed, by amending Section 128 and 131 of the said Act, to make it obligatory for any person reporting acquisition of right in a partition in respect of land and any person alienating any land, that is part of a survey or sub-number, to get a sketch of the said property prepared by a Licensed surveyor.

Hence the Bill."

From the above, it is clear that in order to clear the pending phody cases of about 3 lakhs with regard to measurement, survey sketch, change of survey numbers etc., licensed surveyors possessing requisite qualification and experience are appointed. The licensed surveyors are required to perform the statutory duty of preparing survey sketches of the properties for the purposes of effecting the changes in the revenue records maintained for public purposes. Section 18A(1), further makes it clear that licensed surveyors are appointed for the purposes of third proviso to Section 128 and of clause (c) of Section 131 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Section 18-A(2) mandates that the prescribed fee shall paid to the licensed surveyors."

3. The High Court also took into consideration the provisions of Section 128 and 131 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act and distilled the legal position in the following manner:

"2(d) Combined reading of Sections 128 and 131 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act makes it amply clear that statutory duty of preparing survey sketches is assigned to the licensed surveyors. Prior to coming into force of Section 18-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act (relating to licensed surveyors), the very work of preparing survey sketches was being performed by the surveyors of the survey department appointed by the State Government. The S
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top