SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1278

KURIAN JOSEPH, R.BANUMATHI
Amol – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Kurian, J.

The appellant applied for the post of Krishi Sevak in the Department of Agriculture, Government of Maharashtra.

2. The Tribunal, on verification of the records found that the application was under the quota reserved for Ex-Servicemen. The appellant obtained only 46.25% marks. It appears that the appointment was offered to the appellant under the category of 'Scheduled Castes'. The appellant was offered appointment on the basis of application and on the basis of marks secured by him for the 'Ex-Serviceman' category.

3. The appellant took up a contention that his appointment is only under the 'Scheduled Castes' category. If it was in the Scheduled Castes category, the last successful candidate had secured 62.75% marks. Therefore, in any case the appellant was not entitled for appointment.

4. In that view of the matter, we do not find any reason to interfere with the concurrent findings rendered by the Tribunal and the High Court.

5. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

6. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

7. There shall be no orders as to costs.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI, JJ.

Shankar - Appellant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top