SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 256

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J. Chelameswar, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ.
COMPAQ INTERNATIONAL & ANR. – Appellants
Versus
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR. – Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2538-2539 of 2018 [Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.24305-24306 of 2015] WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2540 OF 2018 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.14955 of 2017]
Decided On : 27-03-2018

IMPORTANT POINT
Some entry in the register of the licensing authority cannot be accepted as the gospel truth.

Headnote:Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 14 – Validity of licence – Original licence valid for 20 years or the licensee attaining 50 years of age whichever is earlier – Thereafter renewal for five years – Subsequently licence converted to commercial, valid up to 2018 – entry in official register showing validity of licence up to 2003 – Obviously incorrect. (Para 10)

       Facts of the case:

       This is a case of motor accident claim.

       Finding of the Court:

       Driving licence was valid on dare of accident.

       Result: Appeals allowed.

       

JUDGMENT

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2538-2539 OF 2018

1. On 12.11.2005, one Mr. Balwant Singh was driving a motorcycle bearing registration No.HR-01R-6462 with Mr. Suresh Kumar as a pillion rider in Village Kansapur, Haryana, when it met with an accident with the offending vehicle, being Car No.HR-02L-8993. The driver of the car was one Mr. Nirmal Singh and the vehicle was owned by Compaq International, insured with Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited. Both the driver and the pillion of the motorcycle suffered injuries. They, thus, filed two claim petitions under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Act’) claiming Rs.20 lakh (by Mr. Balwant Singh) and Rs.15 lakh (by Mr. Suresh Kumar). The two separate claim petitions were tried together and post trial in terms of the award dated 12.2.2008, an amount of Rs.45,500/-was awarded to Mr. Suresh Kumar and Rs.1,21,000/-was awarded to Mr. Balwant Singh. Since contributory negligence was found to be 50 per cent, the amount determined was reduced by 50 per cent to award the aforesaid amounts. All the respondents were made jointly and severally liable, which included the owners, the driver and the insurance company. Interest and costs were also granted.

2. The insurance company filed two separate appeals in respect of the said order. The controversy in question insofar as we are concerned arises from a doubt being cast over the driving licence of the driver, Nirmal Singh. The licence in question was proved as Exhibit RA on the summoning of PW-4, Ashok Kumar, Criminal Ahlmad of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambala Cantonment where the original driving licence had been filed and, thus, the copy was exhibited as RA in the present proceedings. As per RW-1, Nar Singh, Licence Clerk from the Registering Authority, the driving licence was valid from 27.02.1998 to 26.02.2003, i.e. for a validity period of 5 years. This was stated to be on the basis of a dispatch register (R-1). The accident having taken place on 12.11.2005, the plea advanced on behalf of the insurance company was that it was a licence, which had expired. The insurance company, thus, sought to absolve itself of the liability.

3. The aforesaid plea found favour with the learned single Judge of the Punjab & Haryana High Court and in terms of the impugned order dated 15.12.2014, it was held that the insurance company had a right to recover the amount from the driver and the owner of the offending vehicle jointly and severally.

4. The present appeal was filed both by the owner and the driver.

5. Notice was issued on 31.08.2015 and interim orders were granted staying the recovery by the insurance company from the appellants.

6. The only plea advanced on behalf of the appellants before us arises from the aforesaid validity of the driving licence as it is the say of the appellants that some entry in the register of the licensing authority cannot be accepted as the gospel truth and there is an obvious mistake in view of the authenticity of the driving license, its renewal and conversion read with the statutory provisions of the said Act.

7. Learned counsel for the appellants drew our attention to the driving license, which is admittedly issued by the licensing authority. The driving license was issued on 27.02.1998. The driving licence record the date of birth of the driver as 30.04.1961 and is valid for “M/Car, Jeep Only”. The validity date given in the driving license is 29.04.2011.

8. In support of the contention that there could not be any other date than the validity date of 29.04.2011, contrary to the deposition of RW-1, learned counsel for the appellants referred to the provisions of Section 14 of the said Act, which reads as under:

14. Currency of licences to drive motor vehicles.—

(1) A learner’s licence issued under this Act shall, subject to the other provisions of this Act, be effective for a period of six months from the date of issue of the licence





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top