SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 261

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.

1.Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.26993 of 2017 and SLP (Civil) D. No.39750 of 2017. The question for consideration is the validity of determination of seniority of promotee and direct recruit Higher Judicial Service (HJS) officers in the State of Uttar Pradesh. Dispute mainly relates to the principle to be applied for determining seniority for direct recruits and promotees of the years 2007 and 2009 in the context of Rules 22 and 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 (the Rules) and the judgment of this Court in All India Judges Association versus Union of India, (2002) 4 SCC 247.

2. Before giving brief facts we may note that the Rules and the issue of seniority of the HJS officers were subject matter of consideration, inter alia, in P.K. Dixit versus State of U.P., (1987) 4 SCC 621 O.P. Garg versus State of U.P., (1991) Supp. (2) SCC 51 Sri Kant Tripathi versus State of U.P., Ashok Pal Singh versus U.P. Judicial Services Association, (2001) 10 SCC 237 V.K. Srivastava versus Govt. of U.P., (2010) 12 SCC 665












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top