ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.
1.Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.26993 of 2017 and SLP (Civil) D. No.39750 of 2017. The question for consideration is the validity of determination of seniority of promotee and direct recruit Higher Judicial Service (HJS) officers in the State of Uttar Pradesh. Dispute mainly relates to the principle to be applied for determining seniority for direct recruits and promotees of the years 2007 and 2009 in the context of Rules 22 and 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 (the Rules) and the judgment of this Court in All India Judges Association versus Union of India, (2002) 4 SCC 247.
2. Before giving brief facts we may note that the Rules and the issue of seniority of the HJS officers were subject matter of consideration, inter alia, in P.K. Dixit versus State of U.P., (1987) 4 SCC 621 O.P. Garg versus State of U.P., (1991) Supp. (2) SCC 51 Sri Kant Tripathi versus State of U.P., Ashok Pal Singh versus U.P. Judicial Services Association, (2001) 10 SCC 237 V.K. Srivastava versus Govt. of U.P., (2010) 12 SCC 665
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.