SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 307

ARUN MISHRA, UDAY UMESH LALIT
Rakesh Birani (D) Through Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Prem Narain Sehgal – Respondent


ORDER :

Leave granted.

2. The auction purchaser has come up in this appeal against the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court affirming the judgment passed by the Single Bench.

3. The brief facts in the present case are that the auction of the property was held on 14th February 2013. The appellant was the highest bidder. He offered a bid of Rs. 38.30 lakhs and deposited a sum of Rs. 3,90,500/- as earnest money on 1st February 2013. He further deposited 25% of the auction amount of Rs. 5.80/- lakhs on 15th February 2013 and remaining amount of Rs. 8,69,500/- on 13th March 2013. The auction purchaser claimed that he was intimated regarding confirmation of sale by the Authorised Officer of the secured creditor by letter dated 27th February 2013. As soon as he was intimated of the confirmation, he further deposited the 75% of the auction amount on 13th March 2013 within 15 days of confirmation of sale.

4. The owner and principal borrower whose property was sold in auction questioned the same by way of filing a writ petition. The Writ Petition (Civil) No.20653 of 2013 was filed by the respondent. The Division Bench passed the order on 25th April 2013 that as the p





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top