SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 307

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Arun Mishra, Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.
Rakesh Birani (D) Through Lrs. - Appellants
Versus
Prem Narain Sehgal & Anr. - Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 3156 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 7626 of 2017)
Decided On : 21-03-2018

IMPORTANT POINT
Balance 75% of bid amount has to be paid within 15 days of confirmation of sale and not the date of auction.

Headnote:Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 – Rule 9(4) – Balance amount of purchase price (75%) – To be paid to authorized officer on or before the fifteenth day of "confirmation of sale of the immovable property" – Instantly, confirmation of sale made and communicated on 27th February 2013 – Balance amount deposited on 13th March 2018 – Within 15 days of confirmation of sale – Held Rule 9(5) regarding forfeiture of 25% amount in default of payment of balance amount within stipulated period not attracted. (Para 8)

       Facts of the case:

       The auction of the property was held on 14th February 2013. The appellant was the highest bidder. He offered a bid of Rs. 38.30 lakhs and deposited a sum of Rs. 3,90,500/- as earnest money on 1st February 2013. He further deposited 25% of the auction amount of Rs. 5.80/- lakhs on 15th February 2013 and remaining amount of Rs. 8,69,500/- on 13th March 2013. As soon as he was intimated of the confirmation, he further deposited the 75% of the auction amount on 13th March 2013 within 15 days of confirmation of sale.

       An appeal was filed before DRT.

       The Debts Recovery Tribunal has set aside the sale, the order was confirmed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal as well as by the Single Judge and the Division Bench of the High Court.

       Finding of the Court:

       Provisions had been fully complied with by the auction purchaser.

       Result: Appeal allowed.

ORDER :

Leave granted.

2. The auction purchaser has come up in this appeal against the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court affirming the judgment passed by the Single Bench.

3. The brief facts in the present case are that the auction of the property was held on 14th February 2013. The appellant was the highest bidder. He offered a bid of Rs. 38.30 lakhs and deposited a sum of Rs. 3,90,500/- as earnest money on 1st February 2013. He further deposited 25% of the auction amount of Rs. 5.80/- lakhs on 15th February 2013 and remaining amount of Rs. 8,69,500/- on 13th March 2013. The auction purchaser claimed that he was intimated regarding confirmation of sale by the Authorised Officer of the secured creditor by letter dated 27th February 2013. As soon as he was intimated of the confirmation, he further deposited the 75% of the auction amount on 13th March 2013 within 15 days of confirmation of sale.

4. The owner and principal borrower whose property was sold in auction questioned the same by way of filing a writ petition. The Writ Petition (Civil) No.20653 of 2013 was filed by the respondent. The Division Bench passed the order on 25th April 2013 that as the property has already been auctioned, directed the respondent to file an appeal under the provisions of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act of 2002"). Thereafter, an appeal was filed that was registered as S.A. No.1133 of 2013. The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Allahabad vide order dated 19th December 2013, has set aside the sale, the order was confirmed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal as well as by the Single Judge and the Division Bench of the High Court. Hence, the present appeal by the auction purchaser.

5. The main question that arises for our consideration in the appeal is, from which date the period of fifteen days would start for making the deposit of remaining 75 percent; from the date of communication of confirmation of sale or from the date of the auction. The aforesaid dates are not in dispute. The decision depends upon the interpretation of Rule 9 of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (for short "the 2002 Rules). Rule 9 of the 2002 Rules reads as under:

"9. Time of sale, issues of sale certificate and delivery of possession, etc.-

(1) No sale of immovable property under these rules, in the first instance, shall take place before the expiry of thirty days from the date on which the public notice of sale is published in newspapers as referred to in the proviso to sub-rule (6) of rule 8 or notice of sale has been served to the borrower:

Provided further that if the sale of immovable property by any one of the methods specified by sub-rule (5) of rule 8 fails and sale is required to be conducted again, the authorised officer shall serve, affix and publish notice of sale of not less than fifteen days to the borrower, for any subsequent sale.

(2) The sale shall be confirmed in favour of the purchaser who has offered the highest sale price in his bid or tender or quotation or offer to the authorised officer shall be subject to confirmation by the secured creditor:

Provided further that if the authorised officer fails to obtain a price higher than the reserve price, he may, with the consent of the borrower and the secured creditor effect the sale at such price.

(3) On every sale of immovable property, the purchaser shall immediately, i.e., on the same day or not later than next working day, as the case may be, pay a deposit of twenty five percent of the amount of the sale price, which is inclusive of earnest money deposited, if any, to the authorized officer conducting the sale and in default of such deposit, the property shall be sold again.

(4) The balance amount of purchase price payable shall be paid by the purchaser to the authorised officer on or before the fifteenth day of confirmation of the sale of the immovable property or such exte













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top