SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 399

RANJAN GOGOI, R.BANUMATHI
Vijayan @ Viji – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Five accused persons including the present appellants (Accused Nos. 1 and 2) were charge-sheeted and were tried, inter alia, for the offence of murder. Four of the accused persons were convicted by the learned trial Court and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. In appeal, the High Court while acquitting Accused Nos. 3 and 4 maintained the conviction and sentence insofar as accused Nos. 1 and 2 are concerned. Hence the present appeal.

2. PW-1 - John Christopher and PW-29-Raja were examined as eye-witnesses to the occurrence. There is evidence of recovery of blood-stained knives and clothes at the instance of the accused persons. This has been sought to be proved by the prosecution by examining the panch witnesses. Though the learned trial Court accepted all of the aforesaid evidence, the High Court discarded the evidence of P.W.29 as the said witness had failed to identify any of the accused persons in the Test Identification Parade (TIP). The evidence with regard to recovery was also discarded by the High Court as the panch witnesses had turned hostile. The High Court was thus left with the evidence of the sole surviving eye-witness i.e. PW-1.

3. The High Court took




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top