SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta, JJ.
Ram Pal Singh – Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. & Ors. – Respondents
Petition For Special Leave To Appeal (Civil) No. 31990 of 2017
Decided On : 24-04-2018
(a) Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961 – Section 6(1)(b) – Elected member – A person elected in accordance with section 6(1)(b) – Taking oath or not immaterial – A member not taking oath cannot participate in proceedings of the Panchayat – Rule 3(3), Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats (Oath of Office of Adhyaksha or Pramukh Etc.) Rules, 1994. (Para 4, 6)
(b) Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961 – Section 15 – Contention that 13 members who did not take oath could not sign the requisition for no confidence motion and therefore the number of requisitioning members was reduced to 26 out of a total of 63 less than half of total strength – Hence the motion was invalid – Held, if the 13 members were not ‘elected members’ because of not taking oath then the total strength is also reduced to 50 and the motion requisitioned and carried by 26 votes was valid – Further, member does not cease to be ‘elected member’ merely by not taking oath – Such a member can sign the requisition for no confidence motion although he could not participate in the deliberations. (Para 21, 22)
(1984) 2 SCC 404 – Relied upon
A.I.R. 1914 Calcutta 152; 2014 (8) ADJ 525 – Cited with approval
1 Strange 582 : 93 E.R. 714; 10 B. & C. 486 : 8 L.J. (o.s.) K.B. 221 : 109 E.R. 531 – Referred
© Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961 – Section 15 r/w Rule 3(3), Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats (Oath of Office of Adhyaksha or Pramukh Etc.) Rules, 1994 and Articles 84 and 188, Constitution of India – Act, and rules do not attach sanctity to taking oath of office by elected members – Constitution attaching importance to the oath of office – No reason why legislations cannot provide something similar. (Para 35)
Deepak Gupta, J. (concurring)
(d) Section 15 – Members not taking oath – Not entitled to sign requisition for no confidence motion – Sanctity must be attached to taking oath – Advisable to videograph swearing in/oath taking. (Para 47)
(1984) 2 SCC 404; AIR 1914 Cal.152; 2014 (8) ADJ 525– Distinguished
93 ER 714 [ Kings Bench]; 109 E.R. 531 (Kings Bench) – Referred
Facts of the case:
The petitioner is the Pramukh of the Kshettra Panchayat. A no confidence motion against him was carried.
He has challenged the no confidence motion on ground of lack of corum inasmuch as he claims that 13 members did not take oath of office and hence were not entitled to sign the requisition or vote on the motion.
Finding of the Court:
All 63 elected members of the Kshettra Panchayat took the oath of office on 18th March, 2016.
Result: Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT
Madan B. Lokur, J.
Pursuant to a Notification issued by the State Election Commission, U.P. on 21st September, 2015 elections were held to the Kshettra Panchayat, Jasrana, District Ferozabad (U.P.) on 7th February, 2016. Apparently, the results were declared on the same day by the State Election Commission and 63 candidates were declared elected. It may be mentioned that the elections were held under the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Adhiniyam).
An elected member
2. The Adhiniyam does not define the expression 'elected member'. For the purposes of the present petition we are proceeding on the basis that an 'elected member' is a person who has been duly elected. The 'elected member' might or might not have taken the oath of office in terms of the Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats (Oath of Office of Adhyaksha or Pramukh Etc.) Rules, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules). We say this even though there is some sanctity attached to taking the oath of office, which we will advert to later.
3. Rule 2(2) of the Rules defines 'Members' in the following terms, which is also without reference to taking the oath of office:
"2(2) "Members" means in case of Zila Panchayats Members elected under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 18 and in case of Kshettra Panchayat Members elected under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the Act."
4. Section 6(1) of the Adhiniyam provides that a Kshettra Panchayat shall consist of a Pramukh, who shall be its Chairperson. Section 6(1)(b) provides that all the Pradhans of the Gram Panchayats in the Khand shall constitute the Kshettra Panchayat. Section 6(1)(b) provides that 'elected members' of the Kshettra Panchayat shall be chosen by direct election from territorial constituencies in the Panchayat areas. In other words, it appears that despite the sanctity attached to taking the oath of office, an 'elected member' is one who is elected to the Kshettra Panchayat in accordance with Section 6(1)(b) of the Adhiniyam regardless of whether she or he takes the oath of office.
5. The only adverse consequence of an 'elected member' not taking the oath of office is provided in Rule 3(3) of the Rules. The adverse consequence is that if the member of the Kshettra Panchayat does not make or subscribe the oath or affirmation, then he or she cannot take the seat in the Kshettra Panchayat. Rule 3(3) reads :
"3(3). The members of Zila Panchayat and Kshettra Panchayat before taking their seats for the first time as such members shall make or subscribe oath or affirmation in the case of member of Zila Panchayat before the Adhyaksha and in his absence before the Mukhya Adhikari and in the case of members of the Kshettra Panchayat before the Pramukh and in his absence before the Khand Vikas Adhikari in the form set out in the Appendix."
6. In other words, a person duly elected to a Kshettra Panchayat under Section 6(1)(b) of the Adhiniyam is described as and remains an 'elected member' and if that 'elected member' does not take the oath of office, he or she does not cease to be an 'elected member'. The only consequence is that the 'elected member' cannot take a seat in the Kshettra Panchayat and therefore cannot participate in the proceedings of the Panchayat. The significance of this discussion will be apparent hereafter.
Taking the oath of office
7. After the result of the elections was notified by the State Election Commission, the first meeting of the Kshettra Panchayat took place on 18th March, 2016. In this meeting, the 'elected members' elected the petitioner (Ram Pal Singh) as the Pramukh. He subscribed to the oath of office before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate/appointee of the District Magistrate. Thereafter, the version advanced by the petitioner is that he administered the oath of office to the 'elected members' except 17 elected members who were not present. On the other hand, the version
Pashupati Nath Sukul v. Nem Chandra Jain
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.