RANJAN GOGOI, N.V.RAMANA, R.BANUMATHI, MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR, S.ABDUL NAZEER
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE – Appellant
Versus
GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH ITS SECRETARY – Respondent
JUDGMENT
RANJAN GOGOI, J.
1. First, the facts:
The respondent – Assessees are manufacturers of dissolved and compressed industrial gases, liquid chlorine and other allied products. Cotton yarn and Post Mix Concentrate manufactured by two other individual assessees are also in issue. These articles are supplied to the customers in tonners, cylinders, carboys, paper cones and HDPE bags, BIBs, pipeline and canisters, which may be more conveniently referred to as “containers”. In some cases the containers are provided by the Assessees to the customers on rent whereas in others the customers bring their own containers. For making available or for filling up the containers provided by the customers the Assessees charge the customers certain amounts under different heads viz. packing charges, wear and tear charges, facility charges, service charges, delivery and collection charges, rental charges, repair and testing charges. The Assessees treat the said amounts as their income from ancillary or allied ventures.
2. The issue arising is whether the aforesaid charges realised by the Asse
Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International Ltd.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry v. Acer India Ltd.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore v. Grasim Industries Ltd.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore VS Grasim Industries Ltd.
Governor-General in Council v. Province of Madras
R.C. Jall Parsi v. Union of India
Atic Industries Limited v. H.H. Dewa, Asstt. Collector of Central Excise
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.