Back
2016 Supreme(SC) 1171
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DIPAK MISRA, SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, JJ.
ASHISH RANJAN & ORS. – Appellants
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. - Respondents
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 10, 11 AND 12 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 76 OF 2015
Decided on : 24-02-2016.
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Vivek Tankha, Sr. Adv., Mr. Romy Chacko, Adv., Mr. Prashant R. Dahat, Adv., Mr. Puneet Yadav, Adv., Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Adv.
For the Respondent: Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG., Ms. R. Pandey, Adv., Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv., Ms. Saudamini Sharma, Adv., Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv., Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Adv., Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv., Ms. Vara Gour, Adv., Mr. Dhowal Mohan, Adv., Mr. M. T. George, Adv., Ms. Prerana Chaturvedi, Adv., Ms. Nidhi Gupta, AAG., Ms. Rachana Gandhi, Adv., Mr. Irshad Ahmad, AAG, Mr. A. Yadav, Adv., Mr. Abhisth Kumar, Adv., Mr. Kumar Saurav, Adv., Mr. Romy Chacko, Adv., Mr. Ramesh Babu M.R., Adv., Mr. S. Udaya K. Sagar, Adv., Mr. Krishna Singh, Adv., Mr. Venkita Subramoniam T.R., Adv., Mr. S. S. Shamshery, AAG., Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv., Mr. Ishu Prayas, Adv., Ms. Ruchi K., Adv.
Headnote:Medical education – Admission – Court refusing to interfere with its order dated 18th January, 2016 – Held, however, that it would be open to the applicant consortium to take students from State list or All India list, as the case may be – Liberty given to applicant consortium to approach Supreme Court if students from State list or All India list are not made available to it. (Para 3, 4)
ORDER :
1. We have heard Mr. Vivek Tankha, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant, Ms. Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General for the Union of India, Mr.Gaurav Sharma, learned counsel for the Medical Council of India and Mr. M. T. George, learned counsel appearing for the State of Kerala.
2. We are not inclined to interfere with this Court's order dated 18th January, 2016. The instant interlocutory applications are dismissed.
3. However, it would be open to the applicant consortium to take students from State list or All India list, as the case may be.
4. At this juncture, Mr. Vivek Tankha submitted that liberty may be granted to the applicant if there will be some I.A. 10, 11 and 12 of 2016 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 76/2015 difficulty in getting students from State list or All India list, the consortium may approach this Court. Limited liberty is granted only in this regard, viz., if for some reasons, the students from State list or All India list are not made available to the applicant consortium, to approach this Court.
