SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 524

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
NAVEEN KAUSHIK – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent


ORDER :

1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

Criminal Appeal NO(s).1393 of 2013, Criminal Appeal NO(s).1377/2013, 1383/2013, 1399/2013, 1405/2013, and SLP(Crl.)NO.6837/2013, Criminal Appeal NO.1382 of 2013,

Criminal Appeal NO. 1396 of 2013, Criminal Appeal NO(s).1389/2013, 1388/2013, 1390/2013

SLP(Crl.)NO.2610/2013, Crl.Appeal NO(s).1398/2013, SLP (Crl.) NO(s). 6835/2013, 6834/2013, Criminal Appeal NO(s).1397/2013, 1402/2013, 1401/2013, 1404/2013, 1403/2013, SLP(Crl.)NO(s).9652-53/2013, 1451/2014, 1399/2014, 2508/2014, 2970/2014, 2507/2014, 6372/2014, 6391/2014, Criminal Appeal NO(s). 1400/2013

Criminal Appeal NO(s). 388/2014, SLP (Crl.) NO(s).2939/2014, 2977/2014, 4709/2014, 6691-6692/2014,

2. The appeals and the special leave petition are allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to any contention to be raised before the trial court in accordance with law.

3. The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further proceedings on 21st May, 2018 or as per the scheduled date.

Criminal Appeal NO.1394/2013 :

4. In view of judgment of this Court dated 28th March, 2018 in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. And Anr. v. Central Bureau of Inve























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top