ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
NAVEEN KAUSHIK – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent
ORDER :
1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
Criminal Appeal NO(s).1393 of 2013, Criminal Appeal NO(s).1377/2013, 1383/2013, 1399/2013, 1405/2013, and SLP(Crl.)NO.6837/2013, Criminal Appeal NO.1382 of 2013,
Criminal Appeal NO. 1396 of 2013, Criminal Appeal NO(s).1389/2013, 1388/2013, 1390/2013
SLP(Crl.)NO.2610/2013, Crl.Appeal NO(s).1398/2013, SLP (Crl.) NO(s). 6835/2013, 6834/2013, Criminal Appeal NO(s).1397/2013, 1402/2013, 1401/2013, 1404/2013, 1403/2013, SLP(Crl.)NO(s).9652-53/2013, 1451/2014, 1399/2014, 2508/2014, 2970/2014, 2507/2014, 6372/2014, 6391/2014, Criminal Appeal NO(s). 1400/2013
Criminal Appeal NO(s). 388/2014, SLP (Crl.) NO(s).2939/2014, 2977/2014, 4709/2014, 6691-6692/2014,
2. The appeals and the special leave petition are allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to any contention to be raised before the trial court in accordance with law.
3. The parties are directed to appear before the trial court for further proceedings on 21st May, 2018 or as per the scheduled date.
Criminal Appeal NO.1394/2013 :
4. In view of judgment of this Court dated 28th March, 2018 in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. And Anr. v. Central Bureau of Inve
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.