SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 543

N.V.RAMANA, S.ABDUL NAZEER
RAMA DEVI NAYAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 3.11.2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur, in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12362 of 2017 titled as Mukesh Chaudhary versus State of Rajasthan, whereby the High Court granted bail to the Respondent No.2 – accused Mukesh Chaudhary.

3. The appellant herein is the complainant in the F.I.R. No. 235 of 2017, dated 17.5.2017, registered at Police Station Karni Vihar for offence under Sections 302, 452, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant is aggrieved by grant of bail to the respondent No.2 by the High Court of Rajasthan.

4. Broadly the case portrayed by the appellant-complainant, is that the present respondent-accused, is said to be the main conspirator, who hatched a plan to kill his sister’s husband (deceased), which they have dubbed as honor-killing. The background to this crime is alleged to have emanated from a love marriage between the deceased and the daughter-in-law of the appellant, which was not liked by the respondent-accused. It is further alleged that the accused respondent is supposed to have pressurized a







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top