Back
2018 Supreme(SC) 565
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Ranjan Gogoi, R. Banumathi, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, JJ.
Municipal Corporation, Ujjain & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
BVG India Limited & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 3330, 3331 & 3332 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 11967, 17201 & 30776 of 2016)
Decided On : 28-03-2018
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Devadatt Kamat, Mr. Rajesh Inamdar, Mr. Aditya Bhat, Mr. Gautam Talukdar, Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad
The court has the authority to correct typographic mistakes in judgments to accurately reflect the intended decision.
Headnote:
Correction - Typographic Mistake - The court corrected a typographic mistake in the judgment to accurately reflect the dismissal of Civil Appeal No. 3332 of 2018 filed by BVG India Limited.
Fact of the Case:
The court corrected a typographic mistake in the judgment to accurately reflect the dismissal of Civil Appeal No. 3332 of 2018 filed by BVG India Limited.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that a typographic mistake had occurred in the judgment, and upon verification, it was justified. The court corrected the mistake to accurately reflect the dismissal of Civil Appeal No. 3332 of 2018 filed by BVG India Limited.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the verification of the submission made by the appellant's counsel and the acknowledgment of the typographic mistake in the judgment.
Final Decision: The court clarified and substituted a portion of the judgment to accurately reflect the dismissal of Civil Appeal No. 3332 of 2018 filed by BVG India Limited.
ORDER :
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J.
After pronouncement of the judgment learned counsel for the appellant while mentioning in the court drew the attention of the Court to typographic mistake, that while allowing Civil Appeal Nos. 3330 of 2018 and 3331 of 2018, the dismissal of the Civil Appeal No. 3332 of 2018 filed by BVG India Limited is not mentioned in the said judgment, therefore, the same is to be corrected. On verification, we find that the said submission is justified.
2. Hence, Para 52 of the judgment (operative portion) is to be substituted by the following:
Accordingly, it is made clear that Civil Appeal Nos. 3330 of 2018 and 3331 of 2018 are allowed. Consequently, Civil Appeal No. 3332 of 2018 filed by BVG India Limited stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
3. The aforementioned clarification shall be noted by the Registry in the main judgment and necessary corrections may be effected in the judgment.
