SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 648

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Adarsh Kumar Goel, Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.
State of Chhattisgarh and Anr. – Appellant(s)
Versus
M/s. KMC Construction Limited – Respondent(s)
Civil Appeal No. (s). 4257 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 10697 of 2018 @ Diary No. 6013 of 2018), Civil Appeal No. (s). 4258 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 10703 of 2018 @ Diary No. 6135 of 2018) and Civil Appeal No. (s). 4259 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 10706. of 2018 @ Diary No. 6138 of 2018)
Decided on : 18-04-2018

The M.P. Arbitration Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the dispute under the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, as established by previous judgments and orders.

Headnote:

Jurisdiction - Arbitration - Exclusive Jurisdiction of M.P. Arbitration Tribunal

Fact of the Case:

The court considered the jurisdiction of the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal under the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, in light of previous judgments and orders.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the dispute, setting aside the impugned direction under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Issues: Jurisdiction of M.P. Arbitration Tribunal under M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983

Ratio Decidendi: The judgment of this Court in Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority v. L.G. Chaudhary Engineers and Contractors, (2012) 3 SCC 495 and the order passed by this Court on 8th March, 2018 in the same matter influenced the court's decision regarding the exclusive jurisdiction of the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal.

Final Decision: The impugned direction under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was set aside, and the parties were relegated to M.P. Arbitration Tribunal for further proceedings.

ORDER

1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. In view of judgment of this Court in Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority v. L.G. Chaudhary Engineers and Contractors, (2012) 3 SCC 495 and the order passed by this Court on 8th March, 2018 in the same matter, the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal constituted under the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, (M.P. Act) has the exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the dispute in question. Accordingly, the impugned direction under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be sustained and is set aside.

4. The parties are relegated to M.P. Arbitration Tribunal which may decide the dispute as per provisions of M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 (M.P. Act).

5. The appeals are disposed of.

6. The parties may appear before the Tribunal for further proceedings on 9th July, 2018.

7. It will be open to the respondents to file the very same claim which has already been filed before the Arbitrator.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top