SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 666

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Adarsh Kumar Goel, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.
State of Bihar - Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Brahmaputra Infrastructure Limited - Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 3344 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 18212 of 2017)
Decided On : 22-03-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Naman Nagrath, Harsh Parashar, Zubin Prasad, Aman Pandey, Prateek Khandelwal, Shadan Farasat, Arjun Garg, Rajeev Dhawan, Prashant Kumar, Saurabh Suman Sinha, Aditya Dev T, (M/s. AP & J Chambers), Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Rahul Narayan, Shashwat G, Naman Nagrath, Ms. Renuka Sahu, Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Jay Savla, Parag P. Tripathi, Sridhar Potaraju, Sudhir Mishra, Prabhat Kumar, Petal Chandhok, Udai Khanna, Rishabh Kapur, Priyash Sharma, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Ms. Disha Vaish, D.S. Parmar, Ms. Sujeeta Srivastava, Harsh Parashar, Naman Nagrath, Varun Amar, Shantanu Krishna, Sanjay R. Hegde, Azim H. Laskar, Sachin Das, Chandra Bhushan Prasad
For the Respondent: Shivam Singh, Apoorva Srivastava, Ms. Sugandha Batra, Ranjan Kumar Pandey, Chandan Kumar, Arjun Garg, Jay Savla, Ms. Renuka Sahu, Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Prabhat Chaurasia, Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Preetesh Kapoor, Ms. Vishakha, K. Krishna Kumar, Purushaindra Kaurav, Mishra Saurabh, Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Ms. Anuradha Mishra, Ankit Lal, Varun Mohan, Ankit Kr. Lal, Ravin Dubey, Sudhansu Pal, Nilava Bandhopadhaya, Prateek Khanna

Headnote:

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 [C.A. No. 26/1996] - Section 1 & Bihar Public Works Contracts Arbitration Tribunal Act (21/2008), Sections 8, 9, 22 - Applicability of Act - Arbitration agreement stipulating applicability of Central Act - State Act, is not applicable.

       BIHAR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL ACT, 2008 [Act No. 21/2008] - Section 4(3)(b) - Chairman and other members of Tribunal - Provisions of Section 4(3)(b) providing for termination of tenure at pleasure of Government is inconsistent with Constitutional Scheme, particularly Article 14 of Constitution - Section 4(3)(b) is therefore, arbitrary and unconstitutional.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The State is aggrieved by the appointment of arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Central Act) on the ground that the said Act is excluded by the Bihar Public Works Contracts Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008 (Bihar Act 21 of 2008) (the State Act).

3. To appreciate the plea raised, it is necessary to refer to the scheme of the State Act as reflected in some of the key provisions. Sections 8, 9 and 22 of the State Act are as follows:

"8. Act to be in addition to Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. - Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, and of the provisions shall be in addition to and supplemental to Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and in case any of the provision contained herein is construed to be in conflict with Arbitration Act, then the latter Act shall prevail to the extent of conflict.

9. Reference to Tribunal and making of award.-- (1) Where any dispute arises between the parties to the contract, either party shall, irrespective of whether such contract contains an arbitration clause refer, within one year from the date on which the dispute has arisen, such dispute in writing to the Tribunal for arbitration in such form and accompanied by such documents or other evidence and by such fees, as may be prescribed.

(2) On receipt of a reference under subsection (10, the Tribunal may, if satisfied after such inquiry as it may deem fit to make, that the requirements under this Act in relation to the reference are complied with, admit such reference and where the Tribunal is so satisfied, it may reject the reference summarily.

(3) Where the Tribunal admits the reference under sub-section (2), it shall, after recording evidence if necessary, and after perusal of the material on record and on affording and opportunity to the parties to submit their argument, make an award or an interim award, giving its reasons therefor.

(4) The Tribunal shall use all reasonable dispatch in entering on and proceeding with the reference admitted by it and making the award, and an endeavour shall be made to make an award within four months from the date on which the Tribunal had admitted the reference.

(5) The award including the interim award made by the Tribunal shall, subject to an order, if any made under Section - 12 or 13, be final and binding on the parties to the dispute.

(6) An award including an interim award as confirmed or varied by an order, if any, made under Section 12 or 13 shall be deemed to be a decree within the meaning of section-2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 of the principal Court of original jurisdiction within the local limits whereof the award or the interim award has been made and shall be executed accordingly.

22. Overriding effect of this Act.- Notwithstanding any thing contained in any other Law, Rule, Order, Scheme, or Contract Agreement entered into before or after commencement of this Act, any dispute as defined in Section 2(e) of this Act shall be regulated under the provisions of this Act, Rules and Regulations framed thereunder, and absence of arbitration clause in any contract agreement shall have effect excluding any dispute from the purview of this Act."

4. It is in dispute that the parties have executed agreement dated 22nd June, 2012, providing for appointment of an arbitrator as per provisions of the Central Act. Relevant portion of Clause 25 of the said Agreement is as follows:

"The arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996) or any statutory modification or re-enactment thereof and the rules made there under and for the time being in force shall apply to the arbitration proceeding under the clause."

5. The scheme of Sections 8, 9 and 22 of the State Act shows that in the absence of an agreement stipulating the applicability of the Central Act, the State Act applies to works contracts. Since in the presen





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top