SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 680

A.M.KHANWILKAR, NAVIN SINHA
Devidas Loka Rathod – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

What is the standard for considering unsoundness of mind at the time of offence and how is it proven? What is the role of preponderance of probability and burden of proof in insanity defence under IPC Section 84/105 in sufficiency of evidence? What are the appellate court’s powers to reappraise evidence and grant benefit of doubt in cases involving mental illness and Section 84 IPC?

What is the standard for considering unsoundness of mind at the time of offence and how is it proven?

What is the role of preponderance of probability and burden of proof in insanity defence under IPC Section 84/105 in sufficiency of evidence?

What are the appellate court’s powers to reappraise evidence and grant benefit of doubt in cases involving mental illness and Section 84 IPC?


JUDGMENT :

Navin Sinha, J.

The appellant assails his conviction under Section 302 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), rejecting his defence that he was of unsound mind.

2. In the morning of 26.09.2006, the appellant suddenly picked up a sickle from the shop floor of the iron smith and attempted to assault Gulab Pawar (P.W.11), but which injured Santosh Jadhav (P.W.5) on the jaw and cheek and gave a further blow on his shoulder. The same day, he later assaulted Ulhas Rathor (P.W.3) on his back and neck and rained blows on the back and stomach of the deceased Harish Chandra Chauhan, when the latter tried to intervene. The appellant then tried to flee, throwing the sickle enroute, when he was apprehended by the villagers and handed over to the police.

3. The Additional Sessions Judge, Akola rejected the defence plea for unsoundness of mind, citing insufficient evidence relying on the evidence of Dr. Sagar Srikant Chiddalwar (C.W.1) that the appellant was not mentally sick and fit to face trial. The subsequent conduct of the appellant while in custody, his demeanour during the trial, were further relied upon to conclude that the appellant was conscious of his wrongful acts which were d



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top