SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS)
MADAN B. LOKUR, DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.
GOVT.OF A.P. & ORS. – Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M/S OBULAPURAM MINIG.CO.P.LTD. & ANR. – Respondent(s)
IA No. 78056 of 2018 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7366-7367 of 2010
Decided On : 02-07-2018
Boundary Demarcation - Inter-State Boundary Dispute - Samaj Parivartana Samudaya and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others - [Geological Survey of India Act, 1948 - Section 3], [Survey and Mapping Act, 1952 - Section 4], [Survey of India Act, 1948 - Section 4] - The court discussed the dispute between the States of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka regarding the inter-State boundary and the impact on mining leases. The court referred to the Geological Survey of India Act, 1948, Survey and Mapping Act, 1952, and Survey of India Act, 1948, which provided the legal framework for demarcating the boundary under the supervision of the Geological Survey of India and the Surveyor General of India. The court emphasized the need for the Surveyor General of India to take the matter seriously and complete the exercise by the specified date to ensure compliance with the court's orders.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a dispute between the States of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka regarding the demarcation of the inter-State boundary, impacting mining leases. Despite previous orders and timelines, the demarcation had not been completed, prompting the court to intervene.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the demarcation of the boundary had been delayed for several years, and both states had not shown sufficient interest in resolving the dispute. The court emphasized the need for the Surveyor General of India to take the matter seriously and complete the exercise by the specified date.
Issues: Delay in demarcation of the inter-State boundary, lack of interest from the States of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, non-compliance with previous court orders.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of timely demarcation of the boundary and the need for the Surveyor General of India to take the matter seriously and ensure compliance with the court's orders.
Final Decision: The court ordered the Surveyor General of India to complete the demarcation of the inter-State boundary between the States of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka by the specified date of 31st August, 2018, and listed the matter for further orders on 27th July, 2018.
ORDER
1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties in respect of I.A. No.78056 of 2018 in SLP(C) No.7366 of 2010.
2. The prayer in the application is for extension of time in carrying out the demarcation of boundary between the States of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka by 31st August,
2018.
3. Our attention has been drawn to a decision of this Court in Samaj Parivartana Samudaya and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others [(2013) 8 SCC 154] decided on 18th April, 2013.
4. It is recorded in paragraph 57 of the Report that there is some dispute about the inter-State boundary between the States of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka and which has an impact on the mining leases that have been granted.
Paragraph 57 of the Report read as follows:
“57. In so far as settlement of the inter-state boundaries between the States of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka is concerned, both the States have agreed to have the boundaries fixed under the supervision of the Geological Survey of India. In view of the agreement between the States on the said issue we permit the States to finalize the issue in the above terms. The operation of the 7 leases (Category B1) located on or near the inter-State boundary is presently suspended. Until the boundary issue between the two States is resolved resumption of mining operations in the 7 leases cannot be allowed.”
5. Thereafter, in paragraph 61.13 of the Report, it is recorded that insofar as it is relevant to the present proceedings and as agreed between the two States the inter-state boundary may be determined through the intervention of the Office of Surveyor General of India.
Paragraph 61.13 of the Report reads as follows:
“61.13 Determination of the inter-State boundary between Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh in so far as the same is relevant to the present proceedings, as agreed upon by the two States, be made through the intervention of the office of Surveyor General of India.”
6. Even though the order was passed way back in April, 2013, it has been brought to our attention that no steps were taken from 2013 onwards to demarcate the boundary between the States of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka. Be that as it may, on 21st April, 2014 when this matter was taken up, it was recorded that the Surveyor General of India will take a month’s time starting from 18.04.2014 to complete the survey and a copy of the interim report of the Surveyor General of India will be furnished to the learned counsel for the parties.
7. We are told by learned counsel for the parties that the interim report has not been furinished to them as yet.
8. Learned Additional Solicitor General will place the interim report on record well before the next date of hearing.
9. Even though one month’s time expired in May, 2014, it appears that inter-State boundary between the States of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka has not yet been demarcated.
10. This situation prompted us to pass an order on 14th November, 2017 noting that the boundary between the two States has not yet been demarcated. We, therefore, required the presence of some senior officers from the office of the Surveyor General of India to inform us as to when this exercise can be completed and if there is any difficulty in completing the exercise. The matter was adjourned to 8th December, 2017.
11. On 8th December, 2017, we had noted that the Surveyor General of India and his team of officers will coordinate with the Chief Secretary of Karnataka and the Chief Secretary of Andhra Pradesh in determining the boundary between the States of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. We had also required the exercise to be completed within a period of 12 weeks and had adjourned the matter for 12 weeks. We had also made it clear that if there is any dispute in the method of demarcation of the boundary, the Surveyor General will take a final decision in the matter.
12. Even though 12 weeks had expired, the demarcation has not taken place and on 3rd April, 2018, two weeks’ time was sought which was granted.
13. Now, on 23rd May, 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.