SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 788

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KURIAN JOSEPH, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, JJ.
VISHWAMBARRAO SHANKARRAO MANE – APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. – RESPONDENT(S)
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1845 of 2008
Decided On : 12-07-2018

The court found no justification to interfere with the dismissal of the discharge application as the charges are yet to be framed.

Headnote:

Discharge - Appeal against dismissal of discharge application - Appellant's appeal dismissed

Fact of the Case:

The appellant's application for discharge has been dismissed and the charges are yet to be framed.

Finding of the Court:

The court found no justification to interfere with the impugned order and allowed the appellant to take all available contentions at the appropriate stage.

Issues: Aggrieved appellant's appeal against the dismissal of discharge application

Ratio Decidendi: The charges are yet to be framed, and the court found no justification to interfere with the impugned order.

Final Decision: The appeal is dismissed, and pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The appellant is aggrieved since his application for discharge has been dismissed. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/State, after having gone through the records, submits that the charges are yet to be framed.

3. In that view of the matter, we do not find any justification to interfere with the impugned order. It will be open to the appellant to take all available contentions at the appropriate stage.

4. Subject to the above, the appeal is dismissed.

5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top