A.M.KHANWILKAR, D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
Sushil Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Meenakshi Sadhu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.
1. The present appeal [Leave was granted on 12 January 2012.] is from the judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Calcutta [The High Court delivered judgment on 18 February 2009.]. The appellant, who is a builder, instituted a suit for specific performance of a development agreement, against the respondents, who are owners of the premises. The suit was dismissed by the City Civil Court. The High Court dismissed the first appeal.
2. The subject matter of the suit for specific performance is a development agreement dated 14 April 1992, entered into by the appellant with the predecessor-in-interest of the respondents (Late Kalidas Sadhu) [Late Kalidas Sadhu was the original respondent. Upon his death, by an order dated 12 May 2018, the legal heirs of the original respondent were substituted as existing respondents.] in respect of premises situated at 243N, Acharya Prafulla Chandra Road, P.S. Burtolla, Kolkata – 700 006. The agreement recites that the owners had approached the appellant for construction of a building on the land and that the following terms, inter alia, were agreed upon by and between the parties:
a. The appellant agreed t
Joint Action Committee of Air Line Pilots’ Assn. of India vs. DG of Civil Aviation
Vipin Bhimani v Smt Sunanda Das
Swadesh Ranjan Sinha v Haradeb Banerjee
Chheda Housing Development Corporation v Bibijan Shaikh Farid
Della Developers Private Limited v Noble Organics Private Limited
Ashok Kumar Jaiswal v Ashim Kumar Kar
Stock v Frank Jones (Tipton) Ltd.
Her Highness Maharani Shantidevi P Gaikwad v Savjibai Haribai Patel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.