SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 976

A.M.KHANWILKAR, D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
Sushil Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Meenakshi Sadhu – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.

1. The present appeal [Leave was granted on 12 January 2012.] is from the judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Calcutta [The High Court delivered judgment on 18 February 2009.]. The appellant, who is a builder, instituted a suit for specific performance of a development agreement, against the respondents, who are owners of the premises. The suit was dismissed by the City Civil Court. The High Court dismissed the first appeal.

2. The subject matter of the suit for specific performance is a development agreement dated 14 April 1992, entered into by the appellant with the predecessor-in-interest of the respondents (Late Kalidas Sadhu) [Late Kalidas Sadhu was the original respondent. Upon his death, by an order dated 12 May 2018, the legal heirs of the original respondent were substituted as existing respondents.] in respect of premises situated at 243N, Acharya Prafulla Chandra Road, P.S. Burtolla, Kolkata – 700 006. The agreement recites that the owners had approached the appellant for construction of a building on the land and that the following terms, inter alia, were agreed upon by and between the parties:

a. The appellant agreed t




































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top