SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 1376

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, ARUN MISHRA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
K. Ganesan (Dead) By Lr. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants in CA No. 6048 of 2010 and for Respondents in connected cases:P.S. Patwalia, ASG, K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Advs., Tushar Bakshi, Ms. Gunwant Dara, Arijit Prasad (For B. Krishna Prasad), Advocates.
For the Appellants in CA No. 6371 of 2010 and for Respondent in CA No. 6048 of 2010:Dr. K.B. Sounder Rajan, Ms. Shriya Raj Chauhan (For Mr. Sudarshan Rajan), Advocates.
For the Petitioner in WP No. 1028 of 2013:- Saransh Jain, Priyadarshi Banerjee, Naresh Kumar (for E.C. Agrawala), Advocates.
For the Respondent (Applicants in IA No. 2 and 4 in CA No. 6048 of 2010):M.N. Krishnamani, Sr. Adv., K. V. Mohan, K.V. Balakrishnan, Sumit Attri, Ms. Shipra Ghose, Advocates.

ORDER :

Civil Appeal No. 6048/2010

Having heard learned counsel for the appellants, and having perused the record of the case, we find no justification whatsoever to interfere with the impugned order, directing restoration of 2/3rd pension in respect of the respondent herein, after the expiry of the requisite period of commutation.

2. The instant appeal is accordingly dismissed.

IA Nos. 2/2008, 3/2009, 4/2010 & IA 5/2013 in CA No.6048/2010

3. We find no justification in entertaining the instant interlocutory applications on behalf of persons who had not availed of their remedy before the competent Court. It would be inappropriate for us to examine the veracity of their claims, in the first instance.

4. We accordingly decline the prayer for impleadment, and while doing so, grant liberty to the applicants to seek an appropriate alternate remedy, as may be available to them, in accordance with law.

5. The applications for impleadment are accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Civil Appeal No. 6371 of 2010

6. Heard learned counsel for the rival parties.

7. In view of dismissal of Civil Appeal No. 6048 of 2010 by us today (Union of India and another v. K. Ganesan (Dead) By Lr.), this app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top