SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 1382

ANIL R.DAVE, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Gopal Krushna Goshala – Appellant
Versus
Orissa Indus. Infra. Dev. Corp. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Kaushik Choudhury, Akarsh Garg, (For Sunil Kumar Jain), Advocates.
For the Respondents:Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Ms. V.S. Lakshmi, Ganesh, (For Parmanand Gaur), Pankaj Kumar Singh, Manindra Dubey, (For Satpal Singh), Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

Anil R. Dave, J.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. Upon perusal of the impugned judgment and the evidence which had been considered by the High Court, we are of the view that the High Court ought not to have reduced the amount of compensation for the homestead land from Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs) to Rs. 2,50,000/- (Rupees two lakhs fifty thousand) per acre, especially in view of the sale deeds which had been executed on 21st November, 1979 and had been placed on record by the owners of the land.

3. Upon considering the facts of the case, we feel that Rs. 4,00,000/- (Rupees four lakhs) per acre is the fair amount of compensation for the homestead land. Therefore, we modify the impugned judgment accordingly. Needless to say that on the said amount all statutory benefits, including interest, shall be paid.

4. The civil appeals are accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top