2016 Supreme(SC) 1413
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.K. Sikri, Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.
M/s. Enercon (India) Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Civil Appeal Nos. 1954 of 2006
Decided On : 08-03-2016
For the Appellant :Dushyant Dave, Sr. Advocate, Subramoniam Prasad, Sr. Advocate, Abhay Kumar, Tenzing Tsering, Utkarsh Srivastava and Ashmeet Singh, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Sr. Advocate and V.N. Raghupathy, Advocate.
Certain work related to Wind Mills, even if not falling within the definition of Wind Mill, cannot be treated as 'goods' for the purpose of sales tax.
Headnote:
Sales Tax - Wind Mills - Karnataka Sales Tax Act - Section 8, Entry 57 of Fifth Schedule
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, engaged in the manufacture and sale of Wind Mills, sought exemption from sales tax under Entry 57 of the Fifth Schedule to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. The Assessing Officer excluded certain expenditure from the exemption, leading to a dispute.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that certain parts of Wind Mills, including rotor, hub assembly, nacelle, yaw system, tower, grid synchronization assembly, electrical work, and transformers, qualified for exemption. However, it ruled that foundation work did not fall within the meaning of Wind Mill and was not exempt. The Supreme Court found that foundation work or installation work, even if not falling within the expression 'Wind Mill', could not be treated as 'goods' and hence could not be subjected to sales tax.
Issues: The main issue was whether certain expenditure related to Wind Mills qualified for exemption from sales tax under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that even if certain work did not fall within the definition of Wind Mill, it could not be treated as 'goods' for the purpose of sales tax. The court also highlighted that the Assessing Officer and the First Appellate Authority had classified the work as part of a works contract, and therefore, no sales tax could be charged on such work.
Final Decision: The Supreme Court set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief in favor of the appellant.
ORDER :
The appellant herein, by way of present appeal, questions the validity and legality of the judgment and order dated 18.08.2004 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, at Bangalore, in Sales Tax Revision Petition No. 72 of 2002 which was filed by the appellant herein. The said Revision Petition has been dismissed by the High Court thereby affirming the orders of the authorities below.
2. The facts in brief, which need to be noted for the disposal of the instant appeal, are that the appellant is engaged, inter alia, in the manufacture, sale, installing and commissioning of Wind Mill (Wind Energy Converter). It is a registered dealer under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The appellant had entered into the contracts dated 12th June, 1997 and 11th July, 1997 with M/s. Jindal Aluminium Ltd., Bangalore. These contracts were for installation, erection and commissioning of "Wind Energy Converter" for 16 Nos. Enercon make E-30 rated at 230 KW Wind Energy Converters. These were to be commissioned at Medakaripuram, Chitradurga Taluk, Karnataka State. The total value of the contracts was Rs. 19,67,50,000/-. In the sales tax return filed by the appellant, it sought exemption from payment of sales tax on the ground that as per the provisions contained in Entry 57 of Fifth Schedule to the Act, Wind Mills were exempted from payment of sales tax. The provision for exemption is contained in Section 8 of the Act which reads as under:
"Section 8. Exemption of tax:-(1) No tax shall be payable under this Act on the sale of goods specified in the Fifth Schedule subject to the condition and exceptions, if any, set out therein."
3. Fifth Schedule to the Act gives list of various kinds of goods which are entitled to exemption. As mentioned above, insofar as Wind Mills are concerned, relevant Entry is at Serial No. 57 which is as follows:
"57. Wind Mills and any specially designed devices which run exclusively on wind power including electric generators and pumps running on wind energy."
4. The Assessing Officer after getting details of the aforesaid turnover of Rs. 19,67,50,000/- from the appellant/assessee found that apart from various parts of Wind Mills which were supplied to the customers, expenditure was also incurred towards commissioning of the said Wind Mills at the site which had to be excluded. The exercise done by the Assessing Officer in this respect can be seen from the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer. The relevant portion whereof giving such details, is as follows:
In view of the above it is proposed to assess your case as follows:
Total turnover Less:
Rs. 19,67,50,000.00
1.
Wind Mills (Blades & Generators)
Rs. 12,60,00,000.00
2. Wind Mills (Parts i.e., Baskets & Studs & Nuts & other Accessories Add:G.P.@8%
Rs. 3,49,60,805.00
Rs. 27,96,864.00
3.
Sub Contract of labour (Drawing, Survey, Soil Investigation and Drainage Add:G.P.8%
7,07,548.00
Rs.L 56,603.00
4.
Labour involved in sub-contract a) Civil (Vasu Foundation) b) Electrical(GET Engg) c) Erection charges (Mega Electrical) d) Hire charges Add:G.P.@8%
Rs. 17,46,742.80
Rs.10,76,704.00
Rs. 11,13,307.00
Rs. 21,91,900.00
Rs. 1,75,352.00
Rs. 17,08,25,826.00
Total taxable turnover proposed
2,59,24,173.00
Classification:
1.Transfer of goods involved in execution of works contract u/s 43 of the Fifth Schedule to the Act Rs. 2,59,24,173.50 at 10%
2) TOT on 2,59,24,173.50 @3%Rs. 25,92,417.00
Rs. 7,77,725.00
Total tax proposed
Rs. 33,70,142.55
5. It is manifest from the above that insofar as the manufacturing of various parts of Wind Mills are concerned, they were given exemption by applying the provisions of Section 8 read with Entry 57 of Fifth Schedule to the Act. The figu