SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 1479

A.K.SIKRI, N.V.RAMANA
Raju – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rishi Malhotra, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Naveen Sharma and Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocates.

ORDER :

Leave granted.

2. In this appeal filed by the appellant which is against his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the Sessions Court and upheld by the High Court, main contention of the appellant is that he was a juvenile on the date of the incident, i.e., on 23.03.1996.

3. As such a plea was raised, the matter was directed to be inquired into by the Trial Court, i.e., by the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge II, Tikamgarh, M.P.

4. Inquiry report dated 01.08.2016 has been sent by the II Additional Sessions Judge, District Tikamgarh, M.P., wherein it is stated that on the date of the incident, the age of the appellant was 16 years 11 months and 8 days.

5. It is clear from the said report that the appellant was a minor on the date of incident. As he has already suffered incarceration for more than 3 years, his remaining sentence is set aside. If not on bail, the appellant shall be released forthwith unless required in any other case in which he is tried as a major.

6. The appeal is allowed in the aforesaid term.

Appeal allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top