SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 1567

KURIAN JOSEPH, R.BANUMATHI
C. I. T. , Jammu – Appellant
Versus
Shree Balaji Alloys – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Mr. Arijit Prasad, Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Ms. Gargi Khanna, Mr. S.A. Haseeb, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Mr. D.L. Chidananda, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Mr. B.V. Balaram Das
For the Respondents: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. Jay Savla, Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Mr. Shreyas Mehrotra, Mr. Bhargava V. Desai, Ms. Saumya Mehrotra, Mr. Prateesh Kapoor, Mr. Ranjit B. Raut, Ms. Bina Gupta, Mr. Abhay A. Jena
For the Intervention :Mr. U.A. Rana, Ms. Mridul Elker Mazumdar, Mr. Himanshu Mehta, Advocates for M/s Gagrat & Co.

ORDER :

Heard Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, learned senior counsel appearing for the Revenue as well as Mr. Ajay Vohra, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. The issue raised in these appeals is covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in "Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras v. Ponni Sugars and Chemicals Ltd.", reported in (2008) 9 SCC 337, or in the alternate, in "Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Meghalaya Steels Ltd.", reported in (2016) 3 SCALE 192.

3. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed.

4. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top