Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Advocate, Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Advocate, Puneet Jain, Manu Maheshwari, Ankita Gupta, Chaya Kirti, Apurv Taran Jain, Kabir Ghosh, Advocates and Pratibha Jain, AOR., K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Advocate, Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Advocate, Pragati Neekhra, AOR, Amalpushp Shroti, Rohit Bhat and Kabir Ghosh, Advocates, R. Prabhakaran, S. Beno Bencigar, Maya Krishnan and Manju Jetley, Advocates, Jasbir Singh Malik, Advocate and Usha Nandini V., AOR. Vijay Kumar, AOR. B.K. Satija, Advocate. Pragati Neekhra, AOR. Puneet Jain, Advocate and Pratibha Jain, AOR. Shibashish Misra, AOR. Milind Kumar, AOR. Manjula Gupta, AOR. Amit Pawan, AOR. Lawyer's Knit & Co., AOR. Prashant Bhushan, AOR. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, AOR. Ajay Choudhary, AOR.
For the Respondents:Pinky Anand, ASG, Ajay Sharma, R.S. Nagar, Rekha Pandey, Sunita Sharma, Amit Sharma, R.K. Rathore, S.S. Rawat, Ajay Kumar Singh, M.P. Gupta, Karan Seth, Sanchit Kumar, Rishabh Jain, R.R. Rajesh, Advocates and D.S. Mahra, AOR, Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate and Ashwarya Sinha, AOR, Mridula Ray Bharadwaj, AOR and Ajit Kumar Gupta, Advocate. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, AOR, A. Ramesh, Lokesh Kumar Sharma, Syed Ahmad Naqvi and Shilpi Gupta, Advocates. V. Giri, Sr. Advocate, Subramonium Prasad, Sr. Advocate, B. Balaji, AOR and Santosh Kumar, Advocate. Anish Kumar Gupta, AOR, Chandra Shekhar Suman, AOR Deepshikha Bharti, Rita Gupta, Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, Arpit Rai, Advocates, Sanjay K. Agrawal, AOR, Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, AOR, Sunil Kumar Jain, AOR, Abhinav Mukerji, AOR, Harish Pandey, AOR, Amit Kumar, AOR, Pawanshree Agrawal, AOR, Punam Kumari, AOR, Prem Sunder Jha, C.K. Sucharita, AOR, Charu Mathur, AOR, Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, AOR, Suresh Chandra Tripathy, AOR, Dr. Sushil Balwada, AOR, Anil Kumar Mishra-I, AOR, K.K. Mani, AOR, Ramesh Babu M.R., AOR, Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR.
For the MCI :Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate, Gaurav Sharma, AOR, Deepika Kalia, Dhawal Mohan, Prateek Bhatia, Amandeep Kaur, Kapeesh Seth and Vara Gaur, Advocates.
For the States of M.P. :Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr. Advocate, Mishra Saurabh, AOR, Ankit Kumar Lal and Disha Vaish, Advocates.
For the AFRC : R.C. Kohli, AOR.
For the State of Odisha : Sharmila Upadhyay, AOR.
For the States of UP :P.N. Misra, Sr. Advocate, Abhishek Kumar Singh, Advocate and Abhisth Kumar, AOR.
For the States of Chhattisgarh :C.D. Singh, AOR (AAG), Sakshi Kakkar and Sylona Mohapatra, Advocates.
For the States of Rajasthan :S.S. Shamshery, Amit Sharma, Advocates and Ruchi Kohli, AOR.
For the Govt. of Puducherry :V.G. Pragasam, AOR and Prabu Ramasubramanian, Advocate.
For the CBSE :Neelam Sharma, Rajeev Sharma, Advocates and Tara Chandra Sharma, AOR.
For the Christian Med. Coll. :Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Advocate, Krishna Srinivasan, E.R. Kumar, Geethi Aara, S. Lakshmi Iyer, Anurag Tripathi, Advocates and P.H. Parekh, AOR.
For the Manipal Univ : L.R. Singh, AOR.
For the CMC Ludhiana :Rakesh K. Sharma, Advocate.
ORDER :
C.A. Nos. 4060, 4061, 4062, 4063, 4064 & 4065 of 2009
1. Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, learned senior counsel, resumed his arguments from 10.45 a.m. to 11.15 a.m. Then, Mr. Saurabh Mishra, learned counsel, made his submissions till 11.15 a.m. Then, Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel, addressed the Court from 11.30 to 12.50 p.m. Then, Mr. Vikas Singh made his submissions for few minutes. Thereafter, Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, resumed his arguments and concluded at 4.00 p.m.
2. Hearing concluded.
3. Judgment reserved.
I.A Nos. 67-68 in C.A. No. 4060 of 2009 :
4. The learned counsel appearing for the applicants seeks permission to withdraw these applications as on the same subject he had already approached the High Court.
5. Permission is granted.
6. The applications are accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
I.A. No. 83/2015 in C.A. No. 4060 of 2009
7. List this application tomorrow, i.e., on 17th March, 2016, for orders.
I.A Nos. 87 & 88 of 2016 in C.A. No. 4060/2009 :
8. Ms. Pragati Neekhra, learned counsel appearing for the applicants, has fairly submitted that these applications are premature, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw these applications with a liberty to approach the appropriate f
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
