Back
2016 Supreme(SC) 1637
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, AMITAVA ROY, JJ.
State of Karnataka - Petitioners
Versus
Selvi J. Jayalalitha & Ors. - Respondents
Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos. 6117-6120 of 2015 & SLP(Crl.) No. 6294-6297, 6121-6126, 7107-7112 of 2015
Decided on : 12-05-2016
For the Petitioners:B.V. Acharya, Sr. Adv., B.L. Acharya, Sandesh Chouta, Joseph Aristotle S., Mrs. Priya Aristotle, Ms. Priyanka Gladson, Advocates, T.R. Andhyarujina, Sr. Adv., Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv., V.G. Pragasam, Prabu Ramasubramanian, Soumik Ghosal, Ms. Deepika Kalia, Kapish Seth, Advocates, Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv., Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Ms. Vishruti Vijay, Nitin Saluja, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Dr. Subramanian Swamy, (Intervenor-in-person), Dr. Roxna Swamy, Jay Kishor Singh, Advocates, Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv., B. Kumar, Sr. Adv., C. Manishankar, S. Senthil, A. Asokan, Gaurav Agrawal, J. Karuppiah, K.C. Panneer Selvam, K. Dhananjayan, K. Krishna Moorthy, SND Kulasekaran, Rakesh Sharma, R. Gopalakrishnan, Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, Abhay Kumar, Advocates.
Granting liberty to the senior counsel for the petitioner to provide written notes in reply to the arguments advanced by the respondents.
Headnote:
Senior Counsel - State of Karnataka - The court granted liberty to the senior counsel for the petitioner to provide written notes in reply to the arguments advanced by the respondents. The Special Leave Petitions were listed for further hearing on a specific date.
Fact of the Case:
The court granted liberty to the senior counsel for the petitioner to provide written notes in reply to the arguments advanced by the respondents. The Special Leave Petitions were listed for further hearing on a specific date.
Finding of the Court:
The court granted liberty to the senior counsel for the petitioner to provide written notes in reply to the arguments advanced by the respondents. The Special Leave Petitions were listed for further hearing on a specific date.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi:
Final Decision: The court granted liberty to the senior counsel for the petitioner to provide written notes in reply to the arguments advanced by the respondents. The Special Leave Petitions were listed for further hearing on a specific date.
ORDER :
1. Mr. B.V. Acharya, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner - State of Karnataka in Special Leave Petition (Crl.) Nos.6117-6120 of 2015 resumed his arguments at 11.50 a.m. today and was on his legs when the Court rose for the day, leaving the matters part-heard.
2. Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner - State of Karnataka in Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.7107-7112 of 2015 has given one amended chart regarding details of six companies in the Court today.
3. Liberty is granted to Mr. B.V. Acharya, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner - State of Karnataka to give written notes in reply to the arguments/points earlier advanced by Mr. Shekhar Naphade, learned Senior counsel appeared for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and Mr. L.N. Rao, learned Senior counsel appeared for Respondent No.1 in the lead case, at the earliest.
4. List the Special Leave Petitions on Wednesday, the 1st June, 2016 as Part-Heard for further hearing.
