SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 1696

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.K. Sikri, R.K. Agrawal, JJ.
Shell Exports (Kandla) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Anr. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 1612 of 2007
Decided On : 04-05-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Rauf Rahim, Abhijat P. Medh, Ms. Poulami Das, Advocates
For the Respondents:R. Balasubramanian, Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Pranav Kumar, Santosh Kumar, M.K. Maroria, Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, C.K. Makker, V.K. Verma, Advocates

The statutory notification amending the Export and Import Policy 2002-2007 was effective from the date of issuance, and subsequent administrative circulars could not alter the statutory notification.

Headnote:

Notification - Interpretation of EXIM Policy - Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - [Notification No. 07/2002-2007 dated 05.06.2002] - [Section 5 of the Act] - The court discussed the statutory nature of the Export and Import Policy 2002-2007 and the power of the Central Government to amend it under Section 5 of the Act. The court emphasized that the amendment made by the Notification dated 05.06.2002 was effective from the date of issuance and that the subsequent administrative circular dated 01.04.2003 could not alter the statutory notification. The court held that the appellant was entitled to the benefit of DEPB in lieu of drawback for supplies made to SEZ or unit in SEZ from the date of the statutory notification.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant-assessee challenged the dismissal of the writ petition claiming the benefit under Notification No. 07/2002-2007 dated 05.06.2002, which amended the Export and Import Policy 2002-2007 under Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court's dismissal of the writ petition was set aside, and the appellant was held entitled to the benefit of DEPB in lieu of drawback for supplies made to SEZ or unit in SEZ from the date of the statutory notification.

Issues: Interpretation of the statutory nature of the Export and Import Policy 2002-2007, the power of the Central Government to amend it under Section 5 of the Act, and the effect of the subsequent administrative circular dated 01.04.2003 on the statutory notification.

Ratio Decidendi: The amendment made by the Notification dated 05.06.2002 was effective from the date of issuance, and the subsequent administrative circular dated 01.04.2003 could not alter the statutory notification. The appellant was entitled to the benefit of DEPB in lieu of drawback for supplies made to SEZ or unit in SEZ from the date of the statutory notification.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was held entitled to the benefit of DEPB in lieu of drawback for supplies made to SEZ or unit in SEZ from the date of the statutory notification.

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Sikri, J.

This appeal, filed by the appellant-assessee, challenges the correctness of orders dated 03.11.2004 passed by the High Court of Gujarat in Special Civil Application No. 11755 of 2003. By the said judgment, the High Court has dismissed the writ petition which was filed by the appellant herein claiming the benefit under Notification No. 07/2002-2007 dated 05.06.2002. Obviously, with the dismissal of the writ petition, the benefit has been denied by the High Court.

2. To recapitulate the factual matrix in brief, the Government of India had come out with Export and Import Policy 2002-2007 (hereinafter referred to as 'EXIM Policy') which was promulgated under Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act'). It is not in dispute that this Policy is statutory in nature. The Act also empowers the Central Government to amend, modify or rescind such policy. Exercising this power which is conferred by Section 5 of the said Act, Notification No. 7/2002-2007 dated 05.06.2002 was issued amending/correcting the EXIM Policy. By this Notification, amendments were made to paragraph 7.9 of the EXIM Policy. Since it is the interpretation of this Notification which is called in question, it would be useful to reproduce the said Notification in its entirety. It reads as under:

"In exercise of powers conferred by Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (No.22 of 1992) read with paragraph 1.1 of the Export and Import Policy, 2002-07, the Central Government hereby amends/corrects the Export and Import Policy, 2002-07 as under:

(1) A new sub para {numbered as (iii)} shall be added to paragraph 7.9(I). The text of the new sub paragraph would be: -

(iv) Benefit of DEPB in lieu of Drawback for supplies made to SEZ or unit in SEZ.

Accordingly the amended para 7.9(a)(1) would read as under:

7.9(a) Supplies from DTA to SEZ units shall be eligible for the following:

(I) DTA supplier shall be entitled for: -

(i) Relevant entitlements under paragraph 8.3 of the policy.

(ii) Discharge of export performance, if any, on the supplier;

(iii) Benefit of DEPB in lieu of Drawback for supplies made to SEZ or unit in SEZ.

This issues in public interest."

(emphasis supplied)

3. It is clear from the above that by the aforesaid Notification, the EXIM Policy was amended. One of the amendments, as can be noticed, was that benefit of Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) in lieu of Drawback for supplies made to Special Economic Zone (SEZ) or unit in SEZ were also to be given which means that whenever supplies from Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) to SEZ units were to be made under the EXIM Policy, these were to be treated as exports and entitled to Drawback under the EXIM Policy. However, what was stipulated by the said Notification was that the concerned person making such 'exports' can avail the benefit of DEPB in lieu of Drawback.

4. In order to allow the aforesaid benefit of DEPB in lieu of drawbacks, the Customs Department issued Circular No. 25/2003 dated 01.04.2003. This circular laid down the procedure that has to be followed for availing the benefits. Paragraph 2.5 thereof, detailing such a procedure, reads as under: -

"2.5 Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) Scheme

DEPB Scheme announced in 2002-07 EXIM Policy has been continued. In this regard earlier Customs Notification No. 45/2002-Cus. dated 22.4.2002 and DOR Circular No. 24/2002-Cus. dated 6.5.2002 refers. Henceforth, supplies made by DTA units to units in SEZ would be entitled for DEPB benefits. The area of the Special Economic Zone shall be a Customs Station and all the functions relating to the enforcement of the Customs Act shall be controlled by the Commissioner of Customs with the assistance of proper officers of Customs. The goods entered into the SEZ from the DTA shall be under the cover of a Bill of Export. This Bill shall be registered in the SEZ Customs formation and assigned a running serial number. Thereafter the goods





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top