RANJAN GOGOI, ASHOK BHUSHAN
Designated Authority – Appellant
Versus
Sandisk International Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
Applications for intervention are allowed.
2. Leave granted.
3. We have heard the learned counsels for the parties at considerable length.
4. The challenge in these appeals is against the judgment and order of the Delhi High Court [2015 (322) E.L.T. 846 (Del.)] interfering with the final findings dated 19th December, 2014 issued by the Designated Authority under Rule 17 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 (hereafter referred to as "the Rules").
5. Civil Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 14099 of 2015 has been filed by the Designated Authority whereas Civil Appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 14524 of 2015 has been filed by the domestic industry.
6. We have perused the disclosure statement dated 5th December, 2014 issued by the Designated Authority under Rule 16 of the Rules and the correspondences that have been exchanged by and between the parties thereto dated 8th December, 2014, 9th December, 2014 and 12th December, 2014. We have also perused the exhaustive final findings dated 19th December, 2014 of the Designated Author
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.