SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1517

RANJAN GOGOI, NAVIN SINHA
Basappa – Appellant
Versus
Basvaraj M. Tuppad – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. H. Chandra Sekhar, Mr. Uday Kumar Desai and Ms. Rekha Patil, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Mr. Anil Nag, Mr. Arun Singh, Advocates.

ORDER :

Leave granted.

2. The compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 awarded to the appellant has been reduced from Rs.4,28,376/- to Rs.1,71,350/- by the High Court.

3. The injury suffered by the appellant-claimant is loss of one eye and the physical disability suffered though is to the extent of 30%, the same, in our considered view, has resulted in 100% loss of the earning capacity of the appellant. This is because the appellant was a professional driver and employed as such.

4. In the aforesaid circumstances, merely on the basis of the percentage of loss of physical disability assessed by the medical practitioner the loss of earning capacity could not have been determined by the High Court to reduce the quantum of compensation. We, therefore, set aside the order of the High court and restore the award made by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and direct that all amount due along with interest, as awarded, shall be paid to the appellant by the Insurer within four weeks from today.

5. The appeal is allowed in the above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top