SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1530

J.CHELAMESWAR, S.ABDUL NAZEER
All India Judges Association – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Gourab Banerji, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Mayuri Raghuvanshi and Mr. Vyom Raghuvanshi, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Mr. ANS Nadkarni, ASG, Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Ms. Sunita Rani Singh, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mr. Raj Singh Rana, Mr. Santosh Kumar, Mr. Umesh Babu Chaurasia, Mr. H. Khinchi, Mr. Santosh Rebello, Mr. Pranav Kumar, Ms. Archana P. Dave, Ms. Radhika Sharma, Mr. M.K. Maroria, Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Mr. B.K. Prasad, A&N Administration Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Ms. G. Indira, Advocates, State of AP Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Ms. Prerna Singh, Advocates, High Court of Bombay Mr. A.P. Mayee, Mr. A. Selvin Raja, Advocates, High Court of Chatisgarh Mr. Jugal Kishore Gilda, AG, Mr. A.P. Mayee, Advocates, HC of Chattisgarh Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Mr. V.C. Shukla, Advocates, High Court of Calcutta Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kunal Chatterji, Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Advocates, Delhi High Court Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Mr. A. Venkatesh, Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Mr. Rahul Mishra, Advocates, State of Gujarat Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG, Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Ms. Puja Singh, Ms. Mamta Singh, Advocates, State of Goa Mr. ANS Nadkarni, ASG, Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Mr. Salvador Santosh Rebello, Ms. Sneha Prabhu Tendulkar, Ms. Surekha raman, Ms. Nivedita Nair, Ms. Niharika, Ms. Kanika Kalaiyarasan, Advocates, HC of Gauhati Mr. P.I. Jose, Mr. Shashank Mishra, Advocates, State of HP Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Mr. Yugal K. Prasad, Ms. Parul Sharma, Advocates, HC of J&K Mr. Bharat Sangal, Advocates, State of Jharkhand Mr. Ajit Kr. Sinha, Sr. Advocate, Mr. V.V.V.M.B.N.S. Pattabhi Ram, Mr. Shashank Singh, Mr. Vishal Arun, Advocates, HC of Jharkhand Mr. Krishnanand Pandeya, Advocates, State of Karnataka Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, Advocates, HC of Madras Mr. A. Radha Krishnan, HC of MP Mr. C.D. Singh, Mr. Prateek Rana, Ms. Sakshi Kakkar, Advocates, State of Manipur Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Mr. Naresh Kr. Gaur, Mr. M.N. Singh, Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Advocates, HC of Manipur Ms. Sneha Kalita, Mr. Subro Sanyal, Advocates, HC of Meghalaya Mr. Aman Sinha, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sanjai Kumar Pathak, Advocates, State of Maharashtra Mr. Kunal A. Cheema, Mr. Yogesh K. Ahirrao, Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocates, State of Nagaland Mr. Z.H. Isaac Haiding, Mr. Edward Belho, Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Mr. K. Luikang Michael, Ms. Elix Gangmei, Advocates, State of Odisha Mr. Krishnayan Sen, Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocates, State of Punjab Mr. Saurabh Ajay Gupta, AAG, Mr. Nishant Bishnoi, Govt. of Puducherry Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Advocate, Mr. V.G. Pragasam, Mr. Prabu Ramasubramanian, Advocates, State of Rajasthan Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Mr. Adhiraj Singh, Mr. Arjun Singh, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Ms. Mukul Kumar, Advocates, State of Sikkim Mr. A. Mariarputham, AG, Ms. Aruna Mathur, Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Mr. Amit Arora, M/s. Arputham Aruna & Co., State of Telangana Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Mr. Mrityunjai Singh, Advocates, High Court of Tripura Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocates, State of UP Mr. Aviral Saxena, Mr. Ardhendumauli Kr. Prasad, Mr. Abhisth Kumar, Advocates, State of Uttarakhand Mr. Tanmaya Agarwal, Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Advocates, High Court of Uttarakhand Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, AAG, Ms. Rachana Srivasava, Advocates, State of WB Mr. Soumitra G.Chaudhri, Mr. Chanchal K. Ganguli, Mr. Sudhanshu S. Chaudhari, Ms. Surabhi Guleria, Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, Mr. Nikhil Goel, Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguly, Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Mr. Parijat Sinha, Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Mr. Devendra Singh, Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra, Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, Ms. Archana Mishra, Advocates.

ORDER :

This writ petition is filed by All India Judges Association praying as follows:-

"It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased :

1. To issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or such other writ/order/direction as may be necessary directing the Respondents to constitute all India Judicial Commission in terms of the representation made by the petitioner to respondent no. 1 on 13/05/2015 to review the service conditions of the judicial officers of subordinate judiciary in India including but not limited to pay scale, retirement age, pension and other emoluments of the sub-ordinate judiciary from time to time;

2. To issue such orders as may be necessary to direct the Respondent no. 1 to undertake appropriate exercise to ascertain the feasibility of establishing an All India Judicial Services; and

3. To pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case."

2. Notice was ordered on 14.9.2015. Various States and High Courts, and the Union of India are the parties-respondents to the instant writ petition. All the respondents are served.

3. By an order dated 8th March, 20


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top