SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1531

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DIPAK MISRA, A.M. KHANWILKAR, JJ.
DAR-US-SLAM Educational Trust and Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Medical Council of India and Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petitions (Civil) Nos. 258, 345, 267, 292, 270, 227 of 2017, S.L.P. (C) No. 31037-31038, 31427, 30336 of 2017
Decided on : 09-05-2017

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Romy Chacko, Mr. Shubham Singh, Mr. Varun Mudgal, Mr. S.C. Jaidwal, Mr. Kabir S. Ghosh, Mr. Yogesh Raavi, Mr. Vijay Kumar, Mr. V. giri, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ramesh Babu M.R., AOR, Mr. K. Parameshwar, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR, Mr. Mrityunjai Singh, Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR, Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Ms. Vara Gaur, Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Ms. Deepika K., Mr. ANS Nadkarni, ASG, Mr. A.K. Panda, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. G.S. Makker, Mr. D.N. Dubey, Ms. Asha G. nair, Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Advocate, Mr. G. Prakash, Mr. Jishnu M.L., Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Ms. Beena Prakash, Mr. Manu Srinath, Advocates.

The main legal principle established in the judgment is the requirement for common counselling for admission to medical colleges, including Deemed Universities, and the protection of minority institutions' rights.

Headnote:

Common Counselling - Admission to All India Quota seats in Government Medical Colleges - The court issued directions for conducting common counselling for admission to All India Quota seats in Government Medical Colleges, including Deemed Universities run by religious and linguistic minorities. The directions also included provisions for State Quota seats in Government and Private Medical Colleges, fee structure disclosure, and protection of minority institutions' rights.

Fact of the Case:

The court issued directions for conducting common counselling for admission to All India Quota seats in Government Medical Colleges, including Deemed Universities run by religious and linguistic minorities, as an interim measure.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that common counselling should be conducted for both All India Quota seats and State Quota seats in Government and Private Medical Colleges, with specific provisions for minority community students and fee structure disclosure. The court also emphasized the protection of minority institutions' rights.

Issues: The issues involved common counselling for admission to medical colleges, including Deemed Universities, and the protection of minority institutions' rights.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the need for a uniform counselling process for All India Quota and State Quota seats, the protection of minority community students' rights, and the prevention of seat vacancies through specific counselling and admission procedures.

Final Decision: The court directed the conducting of common counselling for admission to All India Quota seats in Government Medical Colleges, including Deemed Universities run by religious and linguistic minorities, and issued specific provisions for State Quota seats in Government and Private Medical Colleges, fee structure disclosure, and protection of minority institutions' rights.

ORDER :

WP (C) Nos. 267, 292, 270, 227 and 258 of 2017 and SLP (C) Nos. 31037-31038, 31427 and 30336 of 2016

Issue notice.

2. As the respondents have been represented by the respective counsel, no further notice need be issued.

3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, as an interim measure, the following directions are issued :

1. Common Counselling for admission to All India Quota seats in Government Medical Colleges shall be conducted by the DGHS. The counselling conducted by DGHS will also include Deemed Universities as they have an All India character. The Deemed Universities mentioned above shall also include Deemed Universities run by religious and linguistic minorities.

2. Common Counselling for State Quota seats in Government as well as Private Medical Colleges including colleges/institutions run by religious and linguistic minorities affiliated to State Universities shall be conducted by the State Government or the authority designated by the State Government. The notification issued by the State Government intimating the students about the Common Counselling must specify that at the time of counselling the students belonging to minority community will be required to furnish the necessary proof regarding their minority status and submit in writing about their willingness to take admission in the concerned minority college/institution.

3. As per the judgment of this Hon'ble Court in the case of Ashish Ranjan v. Union of India & Ors. [(2016) 11 SCC 225], there shall be only two rounds of common counselling each conducted by the DGHS/State Government or authority designated by the State Government for All India Quota (including Deemed University) and State Quota seats respectively.

4. After the second round of counselling for All India Quota seats, the students who take admission in All India Quota seats should not be allowed/permitted to vacate the seats. This would ensure that very few seats are reverted to the State Quota and also All India Quota seats are filed by students from the all India merit list only. The students who take admission and secure admission in Deemed Universities pursuant to the second round of counselling conducted by the DGHS shall not be eligible to participate in any other counselling.

5. The notification to be issued by the DGHS and the State Government notifying Common Counselling should also provide the fee structure of Deemed Universities and Private Medical Colleges. The DGHS/tate Government should also obtain the consent of the students regarding their willingness to pay the fees provided in the notification and take admission in the Deemed Universities and Private Medical Colleges.

6. The students who secure admission in MBBS course pursuant to the Common Counselling conducted by the State Government, at the time of common counselling itself, should be made to deposit with the admission/counselling committee the Demand Draft towards the fees payable to the institution College/University. The admission/counselling committee shall forthwith forward the Demand Draft to the respective Institution/Colleges/University. The necessity for including the above-mentioned requirement has arisen as it has been time and again noticed that when students report to the college after the counselling they are refused admission by the colleges on some pretext or the other and it is shown by the college as if the student never reported to the college for admission. If the Demand Draft is deposited by the admission/counselling committee then there would be no scope for colleges to refuse admission to any student.

7. In order to ascertain the number of seats that still remain vacant after the counselling the State Government or the authority designated by the State Government shall conduct manual counselling for allotment of students. After the completion counselling, the State Government shall determine the number of seats that are still vacant and thereafter shall forward a list of students in order of merit,









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top