JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD
Common Cause (A Regd. Society) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
WP(C)No.387/2000 :
On the cause of action, which arises for consideration in this bunch of cases, the petitioner in the first instance filed Writ Petition (C)No.387/2000. Thereafter some other petitions were also filed. The factual and legal position depicted in the original writ petition and in the other connected writ petitions, we are informed, stand incorporated and upgraded in Writ Petition (C) No.1024 of 2013. In view of the above, Writ Petition (C) No.387/2000 and the other connected writ petitions referred to above are hereby disposed of summarily.
2. We take up Writ petition (C) No.1024/2013 for consideration, on merits.
WP(C) No. 1024/2013 :
3. The primary issue, which arises for consideration in the instant case, is with reference to the introduction of a complaint redressal mechanism. Such a mechanism is sought in respect of complaints made against television and radio programmes. Illustratively, our attention has been drawn to the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995, and to the rules framed there under, namely, Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. We may illustratively refer to Rule 6, which is extracted hereunder :
"6. Programme Code. - (1) No program
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.