ORDER :

Heard.

2. Perused the record.

3. The order dated 08.03.2001 was passed by learned single judge of the High Court of Calcutta in C.R. No. 5489 (W) of 1991, in the operative portion of which the following order was passed:

“Considering the facts and circumstances, I feel that for the ends of justice time should be given to the corporation for framing a scheme to absorb the said workmen as regular employee.

Accordingly, I grant one year time to food Corporation of India to frame a scheme or to find ways and means to absorb the said workmen. So long the services of the writ petitioner are not regularised in terms do this order, the present system should continue.”

4. Thereafter a contempt petition was filed bearing C.P.A.N. No. 406 of 2002, the same was decided vide order dated 24th June, 2002 in which six months' time was extended to absorb the employees. Accordingly the contempt petition was disposed of.

5. Thereafter the second contempt petition bearing C.P.A.N. No. 75 of 2003 was filed which was decided vide order dated 25.3.2003 in which following order was passed:

“Mr. Thakurdas Roy Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners, disputes such contention. According