SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 1118

A.M.SAPRE, UDAY UMESH LALIT
IMTIYAZ RAMZAN KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shikhil Suri, Adv. Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, AOR Ms. Shilpa Saini, Adv. Ms. Vinishma Kaul, Adv.

ORDER :

1. A letter has been circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment to make arrangement for conducting video conferencing in the case.

2. As prayed, four weeks’ time is granted.

3. List the matter after four weeks.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top