Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2018 Supreme(SC) 1118

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, UDAY UMESH LALIT, JJ.
IMTIYAZ RAMZAN KHAN - Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - Respondent
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No(s). 20446 of 2018
Decided on : 11-07-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shikhil Suri, Adv. Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, AOR Ms. Shilpa Saini, Adv. Ms. Vinishma Kaul, Adv.

Granting of adjournment for making arrangements for video conferencing.

Headnote:
Adjournment - Video Conferencing - Grant of Time
Fact of the Case:

The petitioner's counsel sought adjournment to make arrangements for conducting video conferencing in the case.
Finding of the Court:

The court granted four weeks' time as requested by the petitioner's counsel.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the request made by the petitioner's counsel for adjournment to facilitate video conferencing arrangements.
Final Decision: The matter was listed to be heard after four weeks.

ORDER :

1. A letter has been circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment to make arrangement for conducting video conferencing in the case.

2. As prayed, four weeks’ time is granted.

3. List the matter after four weeks.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document