SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 1143

UDAY UMESH LALIT, M.R.SHAH
Rakesh Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
Kamaljit Singh Sandhu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M. R. Shah, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 29.2.2016 passed in R.S.A. No. 4015 of 2011 by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, by which the High Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by the original defendant Nos. 2 and 3 by setting aside the judgment and order dated 10.8.2011 passed by the Additional District Judge, Gurgaon and, consequently, has dismissed the suit preferred by the appellant herein (original plaintiff). The original plaintiff (appellant herein) has preferred the present appeal.

3. The facts leading to this appeal in nutshell are as follows: That the appellant herein (hereinafter referred to as ‘the original plaintiff’) instituted Civil Suit No. 159 of 2004 against the respondents herein (original defendants) seeking a declaration that the plaintiff is the owner and in possession of the suit property – Plot No. 336 (old) 548 (new), measuring 420 square meters at Block B in the residential colony known as Sushant Lok, Guugaon. It was also prayed to declare the sale deed dated 28.1.2002 executed in favour of the original defendant nos. 2 and 3 by original defendant no

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top