SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1684

KURIAN JOSEPH, R.BANUMATHI
Arun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Amrendra Sharan, Piyush Hans, Ms. Apradhita Mukherjee, B.S. Gautam, Ravindra Bana, Dr. Shiva Sharma, Rachit Batra, Daya Krishan Sharma
For the Respondents: Sangram S. Saron, Shree Pal Singh

JUDGMENT :

Kurian, J.

Leave granted.

2. The appellants approached this Court aggrieved by the insufficiency of the compensation of their lands acquired by the respondents. The notice in this case was limited to the entitlement of enhancement based on cumulative basis. The notice reads as follows :-

".......

Issue notice in both the Special Leave Petitions limited to the claim for enhancement on the basis of 15% annual increase cumulatively, as has been granted in other cases."

3. There is no dispute that in similar cases, the enhancement was granted by this Court with the compensation calculated on the basis of 15% increase on cumulative basis. Therefore, these appeals are allowed and the Judgment, as far as the annual increase is concerned, shall stand substituted as follows :-

"All the appellants will be entitled to 15% increase at Rs. 192 per sq. yard for the gap period of two years and six months on cumulative basis."

4. There shall be no order as to costs.

5. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top