SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1356

RANJAN GOGOI, PRAFULLA C.PANT
Greater Noida Ind. Dev. Auth. – Appellant
Versus
Anand Kumar – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Delay condoned. In view of the extensive hearing that have taken place we feel the necessity of supporting our conclusions to dismiss these Special Leave Petitions with reasons.

2. The core facts that will require specific notice are as follows:

In October, 2004, the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as "the Development Authority") had launched a scheme for allotment of residential plots of different sizes. It is the allotment of plots measuring 1000 sq. mtrs. that is the subject matter of the present proceedings. The allotments were to be made on the basis of draw of lots. So far as allotment of plots of 1000 sq. mtrs. is concerned, the draw of lots was held on 18th January, 2005 which, however, got cancelled because of certain anomalies detected in the course of the draw. A second draw was held on 19th January, 2005. Persons claiming to be successful in the draw held on 18th January, 2005 filed writ petitions before the High Court which were disposed of on 20th January, 2005 directing the writ Petitioners to move the Development Authority by way of representations and such representations were directed to be decided by the Development






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top