SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 1107

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Surinder Singh Nijjar, Arjan Kumar Sikri, JJ.
Kesharbai @ Pushpabai Eknathrao Nalawade (D) By L.Rs. & Another - Appellants
Vs.
Tarabai Prabhakarrao Nalawade & Others - Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 3867 of 2014
Decided On : 27-03-2014

Important Points

Courts have the authority to correct errors in their judgments.

Subject

Judicial Correction - Correction of Judgment

Headnote

Deletion - Correction of Judgment - The court ordered the deletion of a specific sentence from a previous judgment.

Fact of the Case:

The court was informed about an error in a previous judgment and was requested to make a correction.

Finding of the Court:

The court acknowledged the error and ordered the deletion of the specified sentence.

Issues: Correction of judgment based on identified error.

Ratio Decidendi: The court has the authority to correct errors in its judgments.

Final Decision: The court ordered the deletion of the specified sentence from the previous judgment.

ORDER :

1. It has been brought to our notice that in paragraph 22 of the judgment delivered on 14th March, 2014 in Civil Appeal No. 3867 of 2014 [Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 27916 of 2009], the sentence "The judgment of the Trial Court is confirmed on Issue No III also" needs to be deleted. We order accordingly.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top