National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Parvathneni

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2013 Supreme(SC) 1257

H.L.DATTU, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, M.Y.EQBAL
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Parvathneni – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. S.L. Gupta, Mr. S.S. Gupta, Mr. Ram, Ms. Shalu Sharma, Mr. Vikas Chandra.
For the Respondents: Mr. Mohan Parasaran, Mr. Joy Basu, Mr. Saif Mahmood, Mr. Abhinav Mukerji.

ORDER :

1. Application for impleadment is dismissed.

2. Keeping in view the smallness of the amount involved, we are not inclined to entertain this petition under Article 136 of the constitution. The special leave petition is dismissed accordingly.

3. The questions of law raised in this petition are kept open to be decided in an appropriate case.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2013 Supreme(SC) 1257

H.L.DATTU, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, M.Y.EQBALNational Insurance Co. Ltd. – AppellantVersusParvathneni – Respondent

H.L.DATTU, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, M.Y.EQBAL
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Parvathneni – Respondent