Advocates Appeared:
Mrs. Vaijayanthi Girish, AOR, Mr. Harisha S.R., Adv., for the Appellant.

Based on the provided legal document, here are the key points:

• Legal Principle: A coparcener can dispose of their undivided share in Mitakshara joint family property by Will or any testamentary disposition. (!) (!) (!)
• Statutory Basis: This right is derived from Section 30 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, read with its Explanation, which deems the interest of a male Hindu in Mitakshara co-parcenary property as capable of being disposed of by him. (!) (!) (!)
• Effect of Will: Since the testator disposed of his share via a valid Will, no further independent share can be claimed by the appellants in the ancestral properties as members of the family; their share would have devolved on the testator's death. (!) (!) (!)
• Validity of Will: The Supreme Court upheld the concurrent finding of fact that the Will was duly executed under Section 68 of the Evidence Act, despite suspicious circumstances raised by the appellants regarding the timing and the testator's health. (!) (!) (!)
• Property Classification: The court affirmed that properties scheduled 'A' to 'E' belong to the joint family, properties 'F' and 'G' are self-acquired by the testator, and property 'H' is the exclusive property of Smt. K.C. Saroja. (!) (!) (!)
• Outcome: The appeal filed against the High Court's judgment was dismissed, upholding the High Court's reversal of the trial court's decree regarding the 1/10th share claim. (!) (!)