SANJAY K. DIXIT vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(SC) 200

L.NAGESWARA RAO, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
SANJAY K. DIXIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Dr. J. P. Dhanda, Advocate, Ms. Raj Rani Dhanda, Advocate, Mr. Vineet Dhanda, Advocate, Mr. Naushad Alam Usmani, Advocate, Mr. Gopi Chand, Advocate, Mr. Birendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate, Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, Advocate, Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Advocate, Ms. Reetu Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Nihal Ahmad, Advocate, Mr. Kunal Yadav, Advocate, Ms. Neena Shukla, Advocate, Mr. Alok Shukla, Advocate, Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Ajay Veer Singh Jain, Advocate, Ms. Mamta Jain, Advocate, Mr. Uday Ram Bokadia, Advocate, Ms. Divya Garg, Advocate, Mr. Somesh Arora, Advocate, Mr. Sonal Jain, Advocate, Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur, Advocate, Mr. Gopi Chand Nagar, Advocate, Mr. C.K.Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Advocate, Ms. Manju Singh, Advocate, Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocate, Mr. Aviral Kashyap, Advocate and Mr. Amit Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, Advocate, Mr. Punya Garg, Advocate, Mr. Abhishek Jain, Advocate, Ms. Anusha Agarwal, Advocate, Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur, Advocate, Mr. E. C. Vidya Sagar, Advocate, Mr. Alok Shukla, Advocate, Mr. Rabin Majumder, Advocate, Mr. Ghanshyam Singh, Advocate, Mr. Shashank Shekhar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Mukul Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Aftab Ali Khan, Advocate, Mr. Syed Mohammed Aatif, Advocate, Ms. Pratiksha Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate, Mr. Raju Sonkar, Advocate, Mr. Arun Adlakha, Advocate, Ms. Mridula Ray Bharadwaj, Advocate, Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Advocate, Mr. Rishi Malhotra, Advocate and Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

L. Nageswara Rao

Leave granted.

1. All the above Appeals pertain to the selection and appointment to the post of Technician Grade-2 (Apprenticeship Electrical) in the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation. An advertisement was issued inviting applications from the eligible candidates for filling up 2,974 posts of Technician Grade-2 (Apprenticeship Electrical) by the Electricity Service Commission, Uttar Pradesh on 4th March, 2011. The eligibility criteria according to the said advertisement was that a candidate should have two years National/State level professional certificate in Electrician Trade with High School from Board of Secondary Education, Uttar Pradesh or equivalent with Science and Math subjects. In addition, production of Course on Computer Concept (CCC) certificate given by the Department of Electronics Accreditation of Computer Courses (DOEACC) (hereinafter referred to as 'DOEACC certificate'), at the time of interview was compulsory. 16,712 persons applied for selection to 2,974 posts which were advertised. Out of 13,576 candidates who appeared in the written examination conducted on 7th August, 2011, 6,218 persons qualified. 5,687 persons appeared for the interview

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(SC) 200

L.NAGESWARA RAO, SANJAY KISHAN KAULSANJAY K. DIXIT – AppellantVersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

L.NAGESWARA RAO, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
SANJAY K. DIXIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent