SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1725

S.ABDUL NAZEER, J.CHELAMESWAR
B. N. Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
CBI, EOU-IV, New Delhi – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. The application filed by the appellant was allowed by the Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption, C.B.I. Ghaziabad, in Special Case No. 05 of 2012, dated 28th April, 2016, subject to the following conditions:

“1. The applicant/accused will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

2. The applicant/accused will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness.

3. The applicant/accused will personally appear before this trial court on the date fixed.

4. The applicant/accused will surrender/deposit his passport in the court.

Accused/applicant Brijesh Narayan Srivastava (B.N. Srivastava) will furnish two personal bonds of Rs. 50,000/- with two bail sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court.

Since the allegations against the accused are too serious, causing heavy financial losses to the government, therefore, the accused will deposit Rs. 50 lakh in the court within four weeks from the date of his release on bail.”

3. The appellant challenged the condition imposed in the order for depositing Rupees fifty lakh as precondition while granting bail before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Crl. M.A. No. 16764 of 2016. In the said c




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top