SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1733

RANJAN GOGOI, NAVIN SINHA, L.NAGESWARA RAO
Rajwinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Oriental Bank of Commerce – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. Civil Suit No. 731 of 1995 instituted by the appellants has been dismissed by three forums leading to the present appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. Ordinarily and in the normal course this Court would not have been inclined to examine the matter in view of the consistent findings recorded by three forums. However, having considered the facts we are of the view that the matter deserves a closer look for which we have heard the learned counsels for the parties at length.

3. The plaintiffs' (appellants herein) case in the Civil Suit No. 731 of 1995 is that the decree obtained by the respondent Bank in Civil Suit No. 419 of 1994, which is one for recovery of a sum of Rs. 2,34,170/- along with interest thereon is void, illegal and inoperative in law. Accordingly, a declaration to the above effect was prayed for in the suit.

4. A few dates will require recapitulation at this stage.

The father of the appellant No. 1 had executed an agreement to purchase the suit property mortgaged in favour of the Bank which is the subject matter of Civil Suit No. 419 of 1994. The mortgage in favour of the respondent Bank was in the year 1990 whereas the agreem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top