ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, NAVIN SINHA
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ADANI POWER LTD – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.F. Nariman, J.
The appellants in Civil Appeal No. 5865 of 2018 are Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. [collectively referred to as the “Haryana Discoms”], which are distribution licensees in the State of Haryana. The appellant in Civil Appeal No. 6190 of 2018 is the Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. [“GUVNL”], which has been assigned with the task of procuring power by the State of Gujarat. The respondent, Adani Power Ltd., is a generating company in terms of Section 2(18) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and has a 4620 MW coal-fired power plant at Mundra, District Kutch, Gujarat. On 23.06.2005, the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 [“SEZ Act”] was enacted. Section 26 of this Act provides that every Developer shall be entitled to various exemptions, such as duty leviable under the Customs Act, 1962, Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Central Excise Act, 1944, etc. The Government of India approved the respondent as a Co-Developer (which is included within the term “Developer”). The Ministry of Commerce and Industry [“MoC&l”], by a letter dated 19.12.2006, granted approval to the appellant for setting up a power plant in the aforesaid SEZ. Thus
National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board
South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India
All India Power Engineer Federation v. Sasan Power Ltd.
Energy Watchdog v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.