R.BANUMATHI, R.SUBHASH REDDY
NEERAJ DUTTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R. Banumathi, J.
This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 02.04.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Criminal Appeal Nos. 15 and 4 of 2007 in and by which the High Court affirmed the conviction of the appellant under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the sentence of imprisonment imposed upon her.
2. Complainant-Ravijit Singh Sethi received a phone call from the appellant who was working as LDC in Delhi Vidyut Board on 17.04.2000 at 07.30 am asking the complainant to meet her at her house in connection with installation of electricity meter at his shop. When complainant met the appellant, she demanded bribe of Rs. 15,000/- for installation of meter which was subsequently reduced to Rs. 10,000/- after negotiation. The appellant agreed to receive the said amount between 03.00 PM-04.00 PM on the same day at the shop of the complainant. As the complainant was not willing to pay the bribe, he made a complaint (Ex. PW-5/A) before ACB, based on which, FIR was registered. Inspector O.D. Yadav (PW-6) organised the pre-raid proceedings. S.K. Awasthi (PW-5) accompanied the complainant and the complainant paid Rs.
Satyanarayana Murthy v. District Inspector of Police
Kishan Chand Mangal v. State of Rajasthan (1982) 3 SCC 466 [Para 8] – Relied
Hazari Lal v. State (Delhi Administration) (1980) 2 SCC 390 [Para 9] – Relied
M. Narsinga Rao v. State of A.P. (2001) 1 SCC 691 [Para 10] – Relied.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.