SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 244

A.K.SIKRI, S.ABDUL NAZEER, M.R.SHAH
Mantri Techzone Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Forward Foundation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Shashi Kiran Shetty, Mr. Mahesh Thakur, Ms. Anuparna Bordoloi, Mr. Savyasachi Sahai, Ms. Vipasha Singh, Mr. Gaurav Goel, Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, M/s. Devasa, Mr. Maninder Singh, Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Mr. Justine George, Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Ms. Kanika, Mr. Ravi Bharuka, Ms. Sarushree, Mr. Satish Kumar, Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Mr. George Thomas, Mr. Anurag Gharote, Mr. A.S. Bhasme, Mr. Abid Ali Beeran, Mr. Dharuv Mehta, Mr. Nishanth Patil, Mr. Rohit Prasad, Mr. Ananth Suresh.
For the Respondents: Mr. S.K. Kulkarni, Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar, Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Mr. R. Venkataramani, Mr. Shekhar G. Devasa, Mr. Bhuvanendra K.V., Mr. S. Mahesh, Mr. Manish Tiwari, Mr. Luv Kumar, Mr. Praveen Vignesh, Mr. Sajan Poovayya, Mr. Priyadarshi Banerjee, Mr. Pratibhanu Singh Kharola, Mr. Saransh Jain, Mr. Meka V. Ramakrishna, Mr. Madhavam Sharma, Ms. Sriparna Dutta Choudhury, Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, Mr. Mahesh Agrwal, Mr. Ankur Saigal, Mr. Sarans Jain, Ms. Tanvi Manchanda, Mr. Nithin P., Ms. Priyanka M.P., Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Ms. Kiran Suri, Mr. S.J. Amith, Ms. Rithika Gambir, Mr. A. Shwarya Kumar, Mrs. Vipin Gupta, Mr. Udaya Holla, Mr. Basavaprabhu S. Patil, Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, Mr. Parikshit P. Angadi, Mr. Chinmay Deshpande, Mr. Geet Ahuja, Mr. Parikshit Angadi, Mr. Anup Kumar, Mr. O.P. Bhadani, Mr. Rajesh Mahale, Mr. Anand Sanjay M. Nuli, Mr. Dharm Singh, Mr. Sandeep Grover, Ms. Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Mr. Pai Amit.

JUDGMENT :

S. ABDUL NAZEER. J.

1. These appeals have been preferred under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (for brevity 'NGT Act') challenging the judgment and order dated 07.05.2015 and 04.05.2016 respectively passed by the Principal Bench of the National Green Tribunal, New Delhi (for short 'the Tribunal').

2. The appellants in Civil Appeal Nos. 5016 of 2016 and 8002-8003 of 2016 are respondent Nos. 9 and 10 in the Original Application No. 222 of 2014 (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent Nos. 9 and 10'). The said Application was filed by respondent Nos. 1 to 3 herein (hereinafter referred to as 'the applicants'). Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 in these appeals are the State of Karnataka and other authorities. They were arrayed as respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in the application. Respondent Nos. 12 and 13 herein were subsequently impleaded in the application (for short 'the impleaded respondents').

3. The State of Karnataka has filed Civil Appeal Nos. 4923-4924 of 2017, challenging the general condition and direction No. (1) contained in the order of the Tribunal dated 04.05.2016. The other appeals have been filed by different entities, who were not parties before the Tribu
























































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top