SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 256

L.NAGESWARA RAO, M.R.SHAH
SWAPNANJALI SANDEEP PATIL – Appellant
Versus
SANDEEP ANANDA PATIL – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M. R. Shah. J.

Leave granted.

2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 09.03.2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in First Appeal No. 342 of 2015 by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal filed by the original applicant and has confirmed the judgment and decree dated 01.12.2014 passed by the learned District Judge, Pune in Marriage Petition No. 55 of 2012 by which the learned District Judge dismissed the said marriage petition, the original applicant/appellant-wife has preferred the present appeal.

3. The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under:

(a) That the appellant herein married with respondent-husband on 05.04.2010.

(b) That their marriage was an inter-caste marriage.

(c) According to the appellant-wife the respondent-husband started harassing her in various ways.

(d) That he used to come in a drunken state and he withdrew money from the bank account of the appellant by using her credit card. Therefore, on 30.06.2012 the appellant left the matrimonial house and took shelter in her parental home.

(e) According to the appellant-wife, while gathering her personal belongings for leaving the h




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top