SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1752

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, JJ.
UTTARA FOODS AND FEEDS PRIVATE LIMITED - Appellants
Versus
MONA PHARMACHEM - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 18520 OF 2017
(Arising out of SLP(C) No. 26824 of 2017)
Decided On : 13-11-2017

The need to amend relevant rules to include inherent powers to allow a compromise to take effect after admission of the insolvency petition, in order to obviate unnecessary appeals being filed before the Supreme Court in such matters.

Headnote:

Inherent Powers - Settlement Agreement - The court recognized the need to amend relevant rules to include inherent powers to allow a compromise to take effect after admission of the insolvency petition, in order to obviate unnecessary appeals being filed before the Supreme Court in such matters. The court took on record the settlement between the parties and set aside the NCLAT order.

Fact of the Case:

The matter has been settled amicably between the parties, and the court observed the need to amend relevant rules regarding inherent powers.

Finding of the Court:

The court recognized the need to amend relevant rules to include inherent powers, took on record the settlement between the parties, and set aside the NCLAT order.

Issues: Settlement agreement, amendment of rules regarding inherent powers

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to include inherent powers in relevant rules to avoid unnecessary appeals before the Supreme Court in matters where a settlement has been reached.

Final Decision: The appeal is allowed in the aforesaid terms, and a copy of the order is to be sent to the Ministry of Law & Justice immediately.

ORDER :

Leave granted.

2. Mr. Shyam Divan, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent both agree that the matter has since been settled amicably between the parties.

3. In an earlier order dated 24.07.2017, this Bench had observed that in view of Rule 8 of the I & B (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal prima facie could not avail of the inherent powers recognised by Rule 11 of the National Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016 to allow a compromise to take effect after admission of the insolvency petition. We are of the view that instead of all such orders coming to the Supreme Court as only the Supreme Court may utilise its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, the relevant Rules be amended by the competent authority so as to include such inherent powers. This will obviate unnecessary appeals being filed before this Court in matters where such agreement has been reached. On the facts of the present case, we take on record the settlement between the parties and set aside the NCLAT order.

4. As a result, the appeal is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

5. A copy of this order be sent to the Ministry of Law & Justice immediately.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top