SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1746

A.K.SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
HARI SINGH – Respondent


ORDER :

Leave granted.

In all these appeals the short question of law which needs consideration is as to whether the tax at source is to be deducted on the amounts which are paid as compensation or enhanced compensation, etc., on account of compulsory acquisition of land under the provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

2. An admitted fact which is common in all these appeals is that while disbursing the compensation, the Land Acquisition Collector had deducted the tax at source and deposited the same with the Income Tax Department. These appellants preferred the writ petition in the High Court stating that no such deduction at source was permissible in view of the provisions of Section 194LA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, since the land which was acquired was agricultural land and this provision categorically mentions that in respect of agricultural land, tax at source is not to be deducted.

3. There is no quarrel about the position of law mentioned above. After examining this provision, the High Court had passed an order directing the Income Tax Department to refund the amount to the Collector with a direction to the Collector to determine whether the compensation is paid for propert













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top